archived_user
New member
- Dec 7, 2011
- 0
- 0
Why do we say that with conditional heteroskedacity, the standard error is underestimated?
Technically, i think standard errors can be overestimated, and our T and F values will result smaller. As a consequence, we wouldn’t reject the H0 when we would should have and that would cause a type II error
Technically, i think standard errors can be overestimated, and our T and F values will result smaller. As a consequence, we wouldn’t reject the H0 when we would should have and that would cause a type II error