everyone keeps talking about the PM section being really qualitative/conceptual and having tons of tricks. this scares me becuse i found the PM section to be pretty….easy. Since I was not able to memorize al the formulas, I natrually would do better on qualitative and conceptual questions then the quantitative number crunch-y ones.
BTW, not having the formulas memorized is my own fault, there were at least 5-6 on the AM section that I recognized as plug and chug, i knew exactly what they were asking, and knew exactly what formula I needed, just couldnt remember it. FRUSTRATING.
If i was a man who was going in with 70+ scores on a dozen mocks then this talk of tricks would not worry me, i would be confident I identified them. the reason I am worried about this trick stuff is that I took ONLY TWO full mocks (yea thats my first mistake there) and scored a 55 on one, and a 64 on the other. Not to mention, I didnt take either mock until the week of the exam. just severely mis-manged my studies.
Now having said that…the two mocks that I did do were full exams #2 and #3 from the volume #2 of Schweser. It is widely believed that the Schweser mocks were tougher than the real exam, and furthermore it is widely believed that the volume two mocks were tougher than the volume one mocks. So seeing as how I was getting 55-64s (which is band 9/10) on the two toughest Schweser mocks, I think I have a CHANCE. The 64 probably passes…..
Reason I am posting in this confidence thread is because even thought I am not CONFIDENT per se…leaving the exam room (and especially leaving after the PM section I thought I did VERY WELL on) I feel more confident than someone should given my mock scores.
Anyone else feeling this way about AM-PM and easyness? Or am I just talking to…….a bunch of 75%+ mock-ers in this thread who cant realate to the above ^ haha