Anyone else find the Schweser IPS questions terrible

[Kato]

I find the questions and answers to be very ambiguous, inconsistent and even random in their process and selection of what to include/exclude.
Ex: vol. 1 exam #1 Q1 with Trailerpark Jackson.

 

[itsmclovin]

Yes they are very low quality, but all of their products are consistent in this regard. Not sure what they do all year their products are mostly simply reprinted from the prior year and still they fail to properly update the cirriculum or improve the quality of the product. JMHO

 

[Chuckrox8]

It pains me to look at them. They’re poorly worded and generally have you flipping back and forth amongst questions. Fortunately, the CFAI puts quite a bit of time into making sure the exam isn’t a POS.
If it isn’t painfully obvious, Schweser doesn’t dedicate the same amount of resources for L3 as they do for L1 & L2. Hellen Keller could write a better AM exam than Schweser…

 

[KeepOnTruckin]

Hahaha, totally agree Chuck, and I find less and less value in the Schweser AM mocks, particularly in the IPS questions. I find myself even getting pissed, cuz it seems like a waste of time and then you don’t know if you can trust the answers…don’t know how to grade yourself, etc. It’s pretty awesome.
Good news is all this will be done in 9 days! Holy sh*t…

 

[Kato]

Are you guys using only the CFA AM stuff?

 

[gringo_bob]

itsmclovin wrote:
Yes they are very low quality, but all of their products are consistent in this regard. Not sure what they do all year their products are mostly simply reprinted from the prior year and still they fail to properly update the cirriculum or improve the quality of the product. JMHO

this