Back to Back C as an answer choice

M

mhdave

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2026
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Did any of you guys get back to back Cs as an answer choice in the AM session?
 
wow i thought this was only me - but yeah i found loads of responses were C’s…….
 
thanks..u bet..i got a lot of Cs and was almost worried
 
Yes, like 5-6 in a row. Was weird but then I thought - I have more important things to worry about atm. :)
 
I think there is always some “serial correlation” in the answers. I quickly ran a Durbin-Watson test and figured the results are insignificant.
 
krokodilizm wrote:
I think there is always some “serial correlation” in the answers. I quickly ran a Durbin-Watson test and figured the results are insignificant.
Click to expand...
Good because I have no idea how to hansen’ize it! Although I always liked how under two was positive and over negative… a backwards mnemonic.
 
Moey wrote:
krokodilizm wrote:
I think there is always some “serial correlation” in the answers. I quickly ran a Durbin-Watson test and figured the results are insignificant.
Click to expand...
Good because I have no idea how to hansen’ize it! Although I always liked how under two was positive and over negative… a backwards mnemonic.
Click to expand...
LOL - you guys are my kind of people. You hiring?
 
Moey wrote:
krokodilizm wrote:
I think there is always some “serial correlation” in the answers. I quickly ran a Durbin-Watson test and figured the results are insignificant.
Click to expand...
Good because I have no idea how to hansen’ize it! Although I always liked how under two was positive and over negative… a backwards mnemonic.
Click to expand...
Forget hansen. There is a more robust method.
 
CEO10K-DAY wrote:
Moey wrote:
krokodilizm wrote:
I think there is always some “serial correlation” in the answers. I quickly ran a Durbin-Watson test and figured the results are insignificant.
Click to expand...
Good because I have no idea how to hansen’ize it! Although I always liked how under two was positive and over negative… a backwards mnemonic.
Click to expand...
LOL - you guys are my kind of people. You hiring?
Click to expand...
Welcome aboard. Everybody toiling for free here.
 
krokodilizm wrote:
CEO10K-DAY wrote:
Moey wrote:
krokodilizm wrote:
I think there is always some “serial correlation” in the answers. I quickly ran a Durbin-Watson test and figured the results are insignificant.
Click to expand...
Good because I have no idea how to hansen’ize it! Although I always liked how under two was positive and over negative… a backwards mnemonic.
Click to expand...
LOL - you guys are my kind of people. You hiring?
Click to expand...
Welcome aboard. Everybody toiling for free here.
Click to expand...
Guess we’re all a lil more than one standard deviation away from normal then.
 
yep same here.. was going to run the durbin watson test but realized my results were Ar1 time series and so DW wouldnt work… Had to use a first differentiated regression on the residuals…
 
Powerhog1982 wrote:
yep same here.. was going to run the durbin watson test but realized my results were Ar1 time series and so DW wouldnt work… Had to use a first differentiated regression on the residuals…
Click to expand...
Yea, I got AR1 too, no unit root though. I barely know what I’m talking about… :)
Speaking of mnemonics, did anyone use this one: UNIT root : DICKey-fuller?
 
I know the section you are thinking of (6 in a row around the middle), and I can say with certainty that you fell into at least 3 traps.
Thankfully, I discovered them upon review. I’m sorry for your loss.
 
the_main wrote:
I know the section you are thinking of (6 in a row around the middle), and I can say with certainty that you fell into at least 3 traps.
Thankfully, I discovered them upon review. I’m sorry for your loss.
Click to expand...
this….so much this.
 
I have no clue what you all are talking about which has caused my anxiety to flare up again.
 
The_BigGuy wrote:
I have no clue what you all are talking about which has caused my anxiety to flare up again.
Click to expand...
Just a regular flashmob, nothing to do with the actual exam.
 
I think i had 4 or 5 in a row max. ( that was a section I wasnt as comfortable with.) wouldnt be surprised if I missed one there.
 
the_main wrote:
I know the section you are thinking of (6 in a row around the middle), and I can say with certainty that you fell into at least 3 traps.
Click to expand...
Think it was the first ten questions in the AM section. O’ well, guess we’ll find out soon enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top