- Thread starter
- #21
rpradeephere Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >even if you score 0%, youll still get the
> > lowest %. and if you score 100% in one section,
> > youll only get the highest percentage.
>
> This is not correct. You will be allotted marks
> based on how much you actually score. If one gets
> 100%, he is given 100%, not capped at 70% or
> whatever percent. As mentioned, >50/50-70/70+ is
> just used to indicate where our scores fall and
> not for determining pass/fail. Pass/fail depends
> on actual scores.
Just like i stated in my introduction post...
I see this no less that a mind tease, to pass the time.
it is quite interesting to see how we argue about accuracy of not so different statistical techniques.
It has always been clear to all of us i believe, that whatever we do, we will not even get close to a realistic output to what is the effective passing score.
I like this quite a lot and will keep trying this or this model to aproximate that passing grade...
-------------------------------------------------------
> >even if you score 0%, youll still get the
> > lowest %. and if you score 100% in one section,
> > youll only get the highest percentage.
>
> This is not correct. You will be allotted marks
> based on how much you actually score. If one gets
> 100%, he is given 100%, not capped at 70% or
> whatever percent. As mentioned, >50/50-70/70+ is
> just used to indicate where our scores fall and
> not for determining pass/fail. Pass/fail depends
> on actual scores.
Just like i stated in my introduction post...
I see this no less that a mind tease, to pass the time.
it is quite interesting to see how we argue about accuracy of not so different statistical techniques.
It has always been clear to all of us i believe, that whatever we do, we will not even get close to a realistic output to what is the effective passing score.
I like this quite a lot and will keep trying this or this model to aproximate that passing grade...