BandTen wrote:
ltj wrote:
Surely you can see the point I’m trying to make?
Anyway, I dig your user name. To your original post: if you’re comfortable doing it that way then why change it? I found L3 the most cohesive of the levels, naturally, so I didn’t really switch the order of the readings myself. I always do Ethics last so I moved that to the back but then I went in order.
You’ll find that weighting doesn’t really matter as much once you start to do the AM papers. They can drop whatever they want into there, or leave it for PM session, or split it up between the two. As far as what makes up the 40-55% or whatever it is of Portfolio Management? I never even thought to figure that out.
I say just do the order you are comfortable with. You’re going to want to go through the curriculum more than once so adjust from there based on where you’re weak. The only strategy I followed for L3 was hammer as many AM papers as you can. We’ll see if that paid off in 6 days..
Thanks for the advice and good luck on your results!
Would it matter though if I started from Behavioral Finance or Econ? I mean, do the study sessions build on each other like they did in L2, for example if you studied Quants and Econ first it really helped in the valuation study sessions later on.
I find SS 3-6 relate to Portfolio Management, then we take a break and do Econ and asset classes, then back to Portfolio Management specific topics, is that how you saw it?
Thanks.