Best way to attack L2 questions?

L

LexLuther

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2026
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Hi All,
I recently took the level II exam for the first time and failed band 4. I don’t believe the material was the problem. I honestly think it was do to my poor ability to answer the questions in which they are constructed. During my mock exams, I didn’t read the questions the way I would on exam day because I was tired and burnt-out from studying since November. I made dumb mistakes by not reading the entire vinette and missing key facts which led me to wrong answers. I thought by knowing that I mad dumb mistakes, that I would correct them on the exam (not the case at all). Can people who have passed and people going to pass (you) let me know some good test taking strategies. I have been a poor exam taker ever since the SAT’s (if you guys can remember those days).
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
 
I think you just answered your own question :) Make sure you understand the overall concepts of what’s going on. The Schweser material/videos have their shortcoming but they do teach the concepts well. If you get jammed up on a problem but understand the concept, it helps you make a better choice/guess on the exam. I also searched for the topics that I was strongest on at the start of the exam, but that approach might not apply to everyone…
 
But did you read the entire vinette first or did you you answer question by question looking for the answers?
 
I read q first. Then vignette. Don’t forget to read the entire vignette cuz I found myself often stopping once I got the necessary information and moved onto next q which is a huge mistake.
 
LexLuther wrote:
But did you read the entire vinette first or did you you answer question by question looking for the answers?
Click to expand...
Step 1: Read 1st question.
Step 2: Start reading Viginette from beginning to end.
If answer to 1st question pops up, answer it, read 2nd question, then continue reading vignette while looking for answer.
 
Read the first question, then look at the vignette.
A lot of the vignettes are set up so that the first paragraph corresonds to the first question, the second paragraph corresponds to the second question, and so on.
 
After you read 2nd question and you find the answer for that question, do you solve for it? or do you continue to finish reading the whole vignette and then answer questions 2-6 after?
 
would you then not read the whole vignette if you found the answers to each question as you were going through them?
I’m just trying to get a better strategy as the one I had didn’t work..
 
Read questions first to give you idea of what to look for, skim/read vignette and look for possible information to answer question then answer question.
 
The strategy that worked for me 2nd time round was:
1) quickly skim the 1st paragraph or so of the vignette, i found this useful to set the scene, eg the names of people in some cases, the accounting standards in others.
2) read the 1st question, but not the answers.
3) go back to the vignette to find the data to answer the question still without looking at the 3 options
4) repeat for the other 5 questions
The caveat with not reading the answers is that it obviously doesn’t work for every single question. it works particularly well for calculations. Some would say that on exam day you’re wasting time by not reading the answers because in some instances you can select the correct answer without doing a calculation. Anyway, the system worked well for me on exam day and when studying.
 
when I did mocks, I realised that I was sruggling with time. Nothing more annoying than you know how to approach the questions, but run out of time. It’s usually the calculations questions slow you down.
In the exam, I limit calculation questions to maximum of 2 tries. If I don’t get right answers I move on and come back to them once I . Chances are you will get clearer mind to tackle them again. I solved a few in this way. I ended up 40 mins spare time in AM and 20 mins spare in PM session.
Hope it helps
 
Man, by the sound of things I went about this in the wrong way! I had a look at the first question in each item set and then searched ONLY for the information I knew I needed and used it to answer the question. I couldn’t tell you what a single one of those 20 vignettes were about.
It worked.
 
I’m a slow reader (so i’m always fighting hard against the clock). The way i tackled L2 was:
=> In Ethics and FRA: Read the whole vignette, then read the question, then re-read the text to find the answer.
=> Everything else: Read the question; then read the text until you find the question.
To answer correctly in ethics and FRA, you need to understand the whole text (you might find some info in the last paragraph that might help you to answer the first question).
The remaining topics (as far as my official exam/mock exams/sample exams go) almost always proceedin chronological order. ie: you will first find the data to answer the first question , then immediately after that you’ll find info to answer question 2, then 3, and so forth. It’s very unlikely that you will have jump back and forth throughout the vignette to gather the info needed to answer any specific question.
It’s not ideal to go about it this way, but it’s definitely a good heuristic to apply if you’re consistently running out of time. Good luck
 
Thanks for all the input!
I am a slow reader as well. I think I will try to read Q1 and then read the first paragraph of the vignette to answer Q1 and get all the information for the vignette. After that, I will read Q2 and then finish reading all the rest of the vignette and underline/highlight what I think are important factors. Then go back and answer the following questions 2-6.
Does anyone have any comments regarding that strategy or something better they feel is a more efficient strategy?
thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top