guest wrote:I guess the ethics section didn’t sink in to the “charter pending” folks
To be fair, the ethics section describes what not to do, but it doesn’t say what to do in this circumstance. It does say what to do about CFA Level X Candidate; and it does say what to do about CFA.
CFA Charter Pending is a bit like Patent Pending. It’s a descriptive term (descriptions are allowed) without much legal meaning. And it doesn’t say that the CFA Charter will be awarded by a specific time (which is verboten). And it is commonly used, so it’s bit ambiguous.
The CFA Institute has sent a few emails to those who have asked that says that they don’t approve of that wording. But they don’t make it very clear in the ethics material that this is not allowed (they are explicit about not using CFA until work experience is approved, not to say “CFA expected by date Y” or not to say “CFA Level X candidate” after you’ve passed one level and before you’ve paid up for the next exam). Charter Pending is arguably a description, and descriptions are allowed. Heck, it’s a description in their system too.
So yes, they are technically breaking the rules - which we only discover after writing to CFAI to ask - but it’s not an unambiguous area of the ethics curriculum. It’s not a brazen infraction, the way saying you’re a Level 2 candidate when you failed Level 1 is.
CFAI needs to put the appropriate language for this circumstance into the standards of practice and ethics curriculum. It should be a question on the L3 exam at least. It’s a huge gaping hole that applies to a lot of people and that can be fixed by adding a single sentence.
Do they feel that this status is simply not important to cover just because they don’t make any money between passing Level 3 and obtaining the charter? I’ll bet if they said you could say “Charter Pending” as long as you were a paying member of CFAI, that might entice them to add a sentence to the standards of practice.