Tl;dr:
Two out of three for an undergrad student with no direct experience: published peer-reviewed papers, CFA, and/or internship?
Hey guys,
I’m a student graduating a little under a year from now, trying to figure out if going all in on chasing the CFA would be the best path for me. I was hoping you could provide some insight on what I should be doing this summer. Here’s the situation, and the options:
I want to dive into a finance career, and my university happens to offer a course that coaches you up for L1- an already paid for prep course with a much higher than average pass rate seems like a pretty good deal to me. I would invest a good chunk of my time during the summer, and finish up in the fall, taking L1 in December. From there, if I pass, I’d have time to graduate and study up for the June 2016 L2. To back this with more than just exams, I’m working on getting two peer-reviewed papers published.
Unfortunately, that’s where the party ends, keeping in mind that the endgoal is a strong career. I don’t have basically any experience in the field: six months as a self-taught on-the-fly analyst at a startup, trying to put numbers to work behind marketing fluffiness (stemmed one of the papers), and three other seemingly useless unrelated jobs before that (marketing at a startup, market research, and very highly specialized IT). To make it worse, the GPA is only at 3.1, dragged down by a pretty nonstandard sophmore year where it was hard to focus on much of anything.
The way I see it, I can do two of three things this summer (because time…): continue work on the papers, begin work on the CFA, summer internship in the field.
First, the CFA. If I don’t start on the CFA during the summer, I will not be able to complete L1 in the winter, will forfeit the opportunity offered by the university, and afterwards it’ll likely become extremely drawn out. At the same time, I understand that the CFA is not the “golden ticket,” as I’ve seen it phrased–although there seems to be a good amount of dispute on this, with statements that it does open quite a few doors, whatever that means.
Next, the papers (already in the works). These seem far too good to drop: published in undergrad definitely set you apart. One of the papers in on marketing analytics, which would help show competency in working with data on an in depth level. The other is on exploratory research in finance theory–seems to me like a fantastic checkmark in a resume, and a show of mastery of the methods used in the process. However, I have little understanding of whether all this theoretical research would actually count when it came to hiring me down the line without the practical experience. I am not dealing with any compliance questions, not glanicng at any financial statements, etc. Quant work yes, but even then not necessarily in practical application.
Third, the internship. The benefits here are obvious: direct experience in the field, possibly flowing into an average job. Consequently, the cost is forfeiting the job experience. Of course, there’s still the matter of finding one this late in the game and with my less than stellar GPA.
No matter how I spin this, there’s a big opportunity cost. What do you guys think? Two of three: tunnel vision to the CFA, intern, publish. Which ones will benefit the most?
It may be worth noting that I’m looking to live and work in the SF bay area (not sure if job market composition affects the pull each factor has)
Let me know your thoughts, sorry for the wall of text, and thank you in advance!
Edit: trimmed a bit and made more readable
Two out of three for an undergrad student with no direct experience: published peer-reviewed papers, CFA, and/or internship?
Hey guys,
I’m a student graduating a little under a year from now, trying to figure out if going all in on chasing the CFA would be the best path for me. I was hoping you could provide some insight on what I should be doing this summer. Here’s the situation, and the options:
I want to dive into a finance career, and my university happens to offer a course that coaches you up for L1- an already paid for prep course with a much higher than average pass rate seems like a pretty good deal to me. I would invest a good chunk of my time during the summer, and finish up in the fall, taking L1 in December. From there, if I pass, I’d have time to graduate and study up for the June 2016 L2. To back this with more than just exams, I’m working on getting two peer-reviewed papers published.
Unfortunately, that’s where the party ends, keeping in mind that the endgoal is a strong career. I don’t have basically any experience in the field: six months as a self-taught on-the-fly analyst at a startup, trying to put numbers to work behind marketing fluffiness (stemmed one of the papers), and three other seemingly useless unrelated jobs before that (marketing at a startup, market research, and very highly specialized IT). To make it worse, the GPA is only at 3.1, dragged down by a pretty nonstandard sophmore year where it was hard to focus on much of anything.
The way I see it, I can do two of three things this summer (because time…): continue work on the papers, begin work on the CFA, summer internship in the field.
First, the CFA. If I don’t start on the CFA during the summer, I will not be able to complete L1 in the winter, will forfeit the opportunity offered by the university, and afterwards it’ll likely become extremely drawn out. At the same time, I understand that the CFA is not the “golden ticket,” as I’ve seen it phrased–although there seems to be a good amount of dispute on this, with statements that it does open quite a few doors, whatever that means.
Next, the papers (already in the works). These seem far too good to drop: published in undergrad definitely set you apart. One of the papers in on marketing analytics, which would help show competency in working with data on an in depth level. The other is on exploratory research in finance theory–seems to me like a fantastic checkmark in a resume, and a show of mastery of the methods used in the process. However, I have little understanding of whether all this theoretical research would actually count when it came to hiring me down the line without the practical experience. I am not dealing with any compliance questions, not glanicng at any financial statements, etc. Quant work yes, but even then not necessarily in practical application.
Third, the internship. The benefits here are obvious: direct experience in the field, possibly flowing into an average job. Consequently, the cost is forfeiting the job experience. Of course, there’s still the matter of finding one this late in the game and with my less than stellar GPA.
No matter how I spin this, there’s a big opportunity cost. What do you guys think? Two of three: tunnel vision to the CFA, intern, publish. Which ones will benefit the most?
It may be worth noting that I’m looking to live and work in the SF bay area (not sure if job market composition affects the pull each factor has)
Let me know your thoughts, sorry for the wall of text, and thank you in advance!
Edit: trimmed a bit and made more readable