Even in the errata they did not fully update the explanation. Notice the value of the stock at (-,+) is wrong also/still.
Separately, this question is tricky since they give you the probabilities of an up and down move calced by Wolters. I got suckered into using these instead of calcing my own.
It is worrisome that these errors must go unnoticed sometimes, it takes the masses going over them to shake them out