Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Au contraire, OP was coherent…CFAilure wrote:Be aware, OP, you are going to be called a whiner during the next hour or two…
Not really…bertran75 wrote:
Yes, I failed 2013 and 2014 and I expected those results, b/c I did not have enough time to prepare, which was completely different this year. I just don’t see how I could possible get so many of them wrong. Considering the score band of 6, it looks like i got only 20-25% on the AM session. Do you think this is reasonable?itera wrote:
OP, I’m not sure what you expect from AF folks. you post 3 sets of failing L3 scores and then ask if your last one makes sense. Well, the questions are changed up yr/yr, it’s all open ended, and the only answer I can say is yea it looks like it makes sense, becuse your AM is consistenly where you are weakest.
You’ll see the actual answers yourself when it’s posted in soon.
When I got my L3 results, there were definitely a few qusetions I thought I totally nailed expecting >70, and ended up <50. It’s a crap shoot in some ways, one word could have reversed the entire answer.
Most of the suggestions posted so far matched my thoughts.CFAilure wrote:Who you think is going to reply you? People who pass 2015 and drunk with their success? Trolls on payroll? Say them you determined to pass and they will tell you thst you are great. Complain - and they will tell you that you are a whiner, a moron, failed 3 times in a row and you have nothing to do with the program. You - even more fearable - felt into the sin of disbelieve in cfai. They will tear you to bites, you’ll see.
GothamSenator, Thank you!GothamSenator wrote:
Au contraire, OP was coherent…CFAilure wrote:Be aware, OP, you are going to be called a whiner during the next hour or two…
@ OP - I’m really sorry for your situation, it seems like you’re really putting in all the necessary efforts. If I were in your shoes, I’d focus on reviewing this year’s AM when it’s available and see where you’re falling short in these written sessions. No doubt, they’re a challenge. Focusing on the AM almost exclusively won’t hurt your PM performance, you seem to have that session completely nailed. Best of luck.
Say you have your answers written. So what? Could you submit them to cfai after the am answers went public and make a case? Biiiiiig doubt.bertran75 wrote:
GothamSenator, Thank you!GothamSenator wrote:
Au contraire, OP was coherent…CFAilure wrote:Be aware, OP, you are going to be called a whiner during the next hour or two…
@ OP - I’m really sorry for your situation, it seems like you’re really putting in all the necessary efforts. If I were in your shoes, I’d focus on reviewing this year’s AM when it’s available and see where you’re falling short in these written sessions. No doubt, they’re a challenge. Focusing on the AM almost exclusively won’t hurt your PM performance, you seem to have that session completely nailed. Best of luck.
I wish I wrote down the answers right after the exam, while they were fresh in my memory, but i was so sure I got most of the questions right that I did not even want to think about it at the time.
Thank you Eddy.eddy1134 wrote:
i agree that the trend in scores doesn’t make sense and that, based on the pm section, you really knew your stuff more this year versus prior years. and i don’t think it’s possible that you “just don’t get it,” with respect to formulating essay responses - as your 2014 morning performance was decent.
if i were you, i’d for sure pay the nominal fee for a retabulation - just having the peace of mind that someone took another look at your results to make sure there weren’t any obvious shenanigans; that would be worth every penny of the $100 retab fee. beacuse that’s exactly what it would be for me - a $100 “peace of mind” fee.