Do you want to crush Level I?

plyon

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2026
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
How I passed Level I....

This is just what worked for me. Use it (or ignore it) at your own discretion (peril). I have an econ background and have worked as a fixed income PM for fifteen years.

I started a little later than I would have liked for the June exam (mid � February). My basic approach was to keep pace (after catching up) with the 16 week Schweser online seminar. I liked the course because it gave me a schedule to adhere to (discipline is paramount in any self-study venture).

An ideal week of studying consisted of reading the CFAI text (excluding the optional readings) and attempting to do all the problems for each chapter (although these were sometimes pretty hard, so I didn�t always get through them all). Then I would follow up with the relevant Schweser notes, again doing all the Concept Checker questions at the end of each section. That usually took me up to the class (on Tuesday night). Then I�d spend a day or two doing a hundred or more practice questions from the Q bank before I moved on to the next section of CFAI readings.

I endorse the Schweser Notes and Q bank without reservation. The notes especially are an impressive work. Many have relied on them exclusively for their studies, which is a testament to the thought that went into producing them. For me, the CFA charter is so relevant to my professional career, that I wanted to get as much as possible out of the studying and I would encourage everyone to read the CFAI text as well. Even if you have to skip some sections because you don�t have time or don�t understand it, you should try to read the full text first. This will vastly improve your retention of the material when you review the Schweser notes. For review, I usually just referred to the Schweser notes, although sometimes I did go back to the CFAI text.

Throughout the four months of studying, I periodically reviewed sections when I was ahead of the schedule I was following (Schweser also incorporates a week off mid-way through the course � use this for review of your �worst� area). This was especially true of the Ethics material (I read the Practice & Stds book entirely through about once a month). By the time May had rolled around, I had probably completed about 75% of the 4000-odd question bank at Schweser. Ultimately, I did every question in the �Bank�.

I also took the John Harris accounting seminar for CFA candidates. I had never taken an accounting class in college, and have always (over) relied on colleagues for financial statement analysis, so this was really important for me. The class wasn�t mind blowing (though others think so), but he did provide a few invaluable tips / approaches, as well as a comprehensive set of brief notes and three or four hundred problems that I worked through no less than three times over the last two months of study to be sure I had mastered the material.

By the time I got to early May, I was able to clean up the last few sections ahead of time, leaving me almost two weeks before the exam to take my first practice test. The first practice exam I wrote, I scored in the mid 90s. It�s not clear to me that I substantially improved that score over the next two weeks leading up to the exam. Others have (frustratingly) reported similar experiences. This may be the result of the amount of material (and the brain�s fatigue at absorbing it all), or it might just be nerves. But it seemed like many AF�ers had a hard time pushing scores up very much in the last two weeks (with some notable exceptions). If you really want to pass, study early and hard, not late and hard.

June 2 was just another day for me. I honestly felt less exuberance yesterday when I found out my score ( >70% in all sections), than I felt when I sat for that first practice exam and realized I was going to nail this thing. I was literally giggling as I sat in the room waiting for the exam to begin (it wasn�t because I was nervous, it was because everyone else was so nervous!). Of course, if you don�t need to be so confident in passing, you may not need to follow all these steps. For me, the cost of taking this exam again (in mental anguish and time) was too steep to take that risk.

Good luck to all.
 
good post plyon. i imagine that the people sitting for the first time in December dont realize how impressive a 90% score on a practice test is.... let alone your first practice test.

you and JB sold me on the John Harris seminar. i'll be sitting next to you next year for L2 :)
 
Scoring 90% in a practice paper a couple of weeks before the exam is impressive

I thought that the Boston Society Practice Exam was great. It was well worth paying for. I sat it in exam conditions - or as close as possible to them.

I scored mid 50's in the morning and 40% in the afternoon

It was really good for me to do a mock exam before the real thing because -

1) It really motivated me to put some work in
2) I got a better feel for timing (although I ended up with 30mins spare in bother the morning and afternoon on the 2nd of June)
3) Its the first time I concidered exam stategy - I thought that i'd tackle the 'easier' sections first. I found that this did not work for me
 
Fifteen years as a PM helps a little too but is probably not an especially useful study suggestion.
 
monki Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> do you think you have overstudied ?

No. Nor did the joker I sat next to during the exam, when I left 45 minutes early for lunch to go hit golf balls!

(I just wanted to write that... truth is that this material is so central to my work, that I have no way of defining "over studying". Most people would say that over-studying would be spending time way beyond that required to achieve a comfortable margin of safety that you will pass. But that assumes there is no incremental benefit beyond that point. In most cases, however, I believe there IS additional incremental benefit. Therefore, it's very hard to say that I "over-studied.")
 
Would've thought after 15 years as a PM, a little less work would be required!
 
JoeyDVivre Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fifteen years as a PM helps a little too but is
> probably not an especially useful study
> suggestion.

Good one. Truth is, a freshly minted finance degree would have been alot more useful than 15 years of steaks, beers, and getting my ear chewed by bond salesmen!
 
I agree with pylon's view on overstudying. Level I is building a base for what's to come so I think you are doing yourself a huge favor in the long run to put in the time to truly master the material (after all, this material is not that hard, there is just A LOT to cover. think about how many times you read something two or three times and still had no clue what they were talking about? not many for most or never for a few).

I am still terrified of L2 but I feel like I mastered the LI material (the 70% in all sections validated my feelings) and didn't just slip by/got lucky. Luck can only take you so far and will catch up with you eventually.
 
Plyon,

I had a similar experience last year with Level1, but to tell you the truth I was not too happy after the actual exam as I felt cheated by how easy it was and felt that in no way it can be described as " the Gold standard" used in the CFAI marketing material.

I probably worked twice as hard for Level 2 (started in September instead of Feb. 15) and even though I am confident I passed, this time I felt the exam was designed at a much higher level than the Level 1 test and it feels much better to be actually rewarded for the amount of work done.
 
Hi Pylon, don't want to hijack you're thread...but...

I was reading your msg and the first thing that caught my eye is that you have 15 years in fixed income PM and this is exactly what I am trying to get into. In fact, I am currently doing an internship with Citi as a fixed income analyst for high net worth individuals. So, if you don't mind, I would like to get in touch with you for guidance.
 
mo34 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Plyon,
>
> I had a similar experience last year with Level1,
> but to tell you the truth I was not too happy
> after the actual exam as I felt cheated by how
> easy it was and felt that in no way it can be
> described as " the Gold standard" used in the CFAI
> marketing material.
>

Boy... sometimes I post stuff and worry about being perceived as arrogant. But not to worry. mo34 just told me the Level I exam was too easy!

Good for you! Seriously, I feel that I crushed the exam, but the material was so relevant that I don't really think it was too easy. Nice to know I'm about to get my butt kicked in L II.
 
sparty419 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Pylon, don't want to hijack you're
> thread...but...
>
> I was reading your msg and the first thing that
> caught my eye is that you have 15 years in fixed
> income PM and this is exactly what I am trying to
> get into. In fact, I am currently doing an
> internship with Citi as a fixed income analyst for
> high net worth individuals. So, if you don't
> mind, I would like to get in touch with you for
> guidance.

Sparty... post your email address and or phone to plyons (it's a gmail address) and I'd be happy to drop you a line.
 
plyon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Boy... sometimes I post stuff and worry about
> being perceived as arrogant. But not to worry.
> mo34 just told me the Level I exam was too easy!
>


I did not mean to come accross as arrogant. My point is Level 1 can not be qualified objectively as a difficult test. The 40% passing rate does not mean much since anyone can take the test. I have heard and read on this forum many stories about people passing this test with 2 or three weeks preparation. This does not mean that the material is not valuable.
 
Pylon do you mind if I send you an e-mail too regarding your exp as a fixed income pm? Thanks.
 
Pylon,

Impressed by the effort you put on study.

Sorry I have a personal question to ask you. I am currently working on my PT MBA and enrolled in the fixed-income fund of the school as an analyst to cover credit. With long history of being engineer, first Mechnical then IT, does it make sense for me to go after Fixed-cinome route versus Equity?


Good luck on your L2

Steve
 
That's a tough question to answer. I would be inclined to say that it really doesn't matter. Or... if it does matter, than you should really be in derivatives, not vanilla stocks or bonds!

If you have a quantitative background, then you should be somewhere where you will use it. Opportunities to do so are not limited to fixed income, equities, or just derivatives anymore (although I believe there are more of these opportunities in derivatives and fixed income).

Keep studying... My experience also tells me that if you are smart and driven, the people who know better than either of us will eventually find you and PUT you in the spot you should be in. Don't presume to know more than the people who eventually hire you (yet....).
 
Back
Top