kwmitchell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good point.
>
> I'm definitely going with the Schweser...still
> debating on the CFAI materials. It's a tough sell
> for me...because I find it hard to believe that
> anyone that learns the material presented by
> Schweser backwards and forwards couldn't pass this
> little quiz.
I will be careful with that statement. Schweser is a summary of the material. You are relying on the writer of the notes to guage and judge what is important and what is not. For the quantitative material, a summary is adequate as it usually presents the procedure of the calculations. For the qualitative LOS, condensing a 50 page reading into 10 pages runs of the risk of missing out on finer points which can come up in the exam. I can think of lots of material that was in the CFAI text that never even got a mention by Schweser - yet it is clearly examinable.
> On the flip side:
>
> The CFAI materials could help one learn the
> material in Schweser better than Schweser...
It also helps to have 2 sources to compare when you find one explanation hard to understand.
Back when I did it, the texts aren't bundled together. You can buy the book for an individual topic if you feel it's your weakness. But you can't these days.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good point.
>
> I'm definitely going with the Schweser...still
> debating on the CFAI materials. It's a tough sell
> for me...because I find it hard to believe that
> anyone that learns the material presented by
> Schweser backwards and forwards couldn't pass this
> little quiz.
I will be careful with that statement. Schweser is a summary of the material. You are relying on the writer of the notes to guage and judge what is important and what is not. For the quantitative material, a summary is adequate as it usually presents the procedure of the calculations. For the qualitative LOS, condensing a 50 page reading into 10 pages runs of the risk of missing out on finer points which can come up in the exam. I can think of lots of material that was in the CFAI text that never even got a mention by Schweser - yet it is clearly examinable.
> On the flip side:
>
> The CFAI materials could help one learn the
> material in Schweser better than Schweser...
It also helps to have 2 sources to compare when you find one explanation hard to understand.
Back when I did it, the texts aren't bundled together. You can buy the book for an individual topic if you feel it's your weakness. But you can't these days.