bchadwick Wrote:
——————————————————-
> The 75% thing is news to me.
>
> My understanding was that the duration of a swap
> is equal to the duration of the fixed side minus
> the duration of the floating side.
Yes, that’s correct. For the floating rate payer, the swap duration is equal to the duration of the fixed leg minus the duration of the floating leg - and the opposite for a fixed rate payer.
> The duration of the fixed side is equal to the
> duration of an equivalent coupon bond of the same
> maturity as the swap’s tenor. You may be able to
> approximate that with 75% of the time-to-maturity,
> but that’s a *very* rough approximation. I can’t
> imagine that they would have you do that, rather
> than just tell you the duration.
Again, I agree. But they do say in the curriculum that the duration of the fixed rate leg of a swap is 75% of the tenor. It’s a horrible approximation, and you’re probably correct that they’ll just give us the duration for the fixed leg rather than making us use an arbitrary approximation.
> The current duration of the floating side is
> basically equal to the time (in years) until the
> next floating rate reset. If you don’t know the
> time until the next reset, you should assume 1/2*(
> 1/(#resets per year) ), which is 0.25 for a
> semiannual reset and 0.5 for an annual reset.
I agree.
> If you receive fixed, your duration is equal to
> the swap’s duration.
>
> If you receive floating, your duration is equal to
> the swap’s duration times -1.
I agree.