Equity research associate

base would probably be in the 80-100 range. depends which level of associate you are.
all in, I would guess the range to be 120-160, depending on a host of factors.
hours really depend on what your analyst expects. it really varies. in non-earnings, probably most people are gone by 6ish. and fridays you try to get out as soon as the bell hits. in earnings, you get murdered though.
 
honestly, given the hours, the pay is mediocre but the exit opps will problably be fabulous. 80k base to work 70 hours plus the stress of putting together graphs…hmmm.
there are guys making 80k in risk management working 9-5 and occasionally 7-6 in a pretty laid back environment.
i read a bunch of equity research reports and sometimes i feel bad for the guy that has to put it together. the work imo is by no means tough, just strenuous and time consuming. the forecast and price expectation is almost always an after thought and irrelevant. But competition for these jobs is very high which makes them even more attractive.
I much rather work for half the salary but be the guy at the end using the research than putting it together. lets face it, equity analyst are basically the guy doing the grunt work for the end user.
good luck.
 
Black Swan Wrote:
——————————————————-
> Yeah, I have yet to meet someone in ER who doesn’t
> have a top degree, so I wouldn’t use that as a
> source of differentiation. What was your front
> office experience? You’re being very vague about
> it so I’m guessing sales. Plus if it was IB or
> ER(the only ones that matter) you wouldn’t have to
> be asking us this dumb question. As they said,
> it’s a flood of people trying to get in so the
> compensation is subject to supply & demand. As
> you become a more experienced associate, they will
> raise your pay. A top associate may make 200k in
> NYC if they have a few firms of their own
> coverage. At the analyst level, it’s a whole new
> payscale. Anyhow, you should take a look at your
> motives to do ER and how enthusiastically you want
> this position. Those are typically the deciding
> factors for picking from a pool of qualified
> candidates. Oh, and I def agree with Numi.
This is definitely on point – totally concur with what Black Swan says, and I can also confirm the salary numbers. Also, I remember that the original poster also asked about financial modeling books the other day. FYI, if you are interviewing for equity research and don’t know how to build a basic, fully-integrated three-statement financial model, then your skill set and qualifications are essentially entry level. I’d be surprised if you can get a job in equity research these days as an “experienced” hire if you don’t know how to work a financial model.
 
Why does everyone look to transition into the sell-side? It’s beyond me…
You can make more money on the buy-side as an analyst…
You don’t have to pander to PMs and buy-side analysts…
You don’t have to fulfill requests from clients..
You dont have ppl scrutinizing your models, estimates, etc
You have broader coverage on the buy-side and only spend your time working on what you think will make the most money…
 
jbisback Wrote:
——————————————————-
> Why does everyone look to transition into the
> sell-side? It’s beyond me…
>
> You can make more money on the buy-side as an
> analyst…
> You don’t have to pander to PMs and buy-side
> analysts…
> You don’t have to fulfill requests from clients..
> You dont have ppl scrutinizing your models,
> estimates, etc
> You have broader coverage on the buy-side and only
> spend your time working on what you think will
> make the most money…
completely agree. I think buyside is way harder to get into though. I see sellside jobs posted regulary but buyside almost never. I think most people try to transition into the buyside from the sellside.
 
FrankArabia Wrote:
——————————————————-
> jbisback Wrote:
> ————————————————–
> —–
> > Why does everyone look to transition into the
> > sell-side? It’s beyond me…
> >
> > You can make more money on the buy-side as an
> > analyst…
> > You don’t have to pander to PMs and buy-side
> > analysts…
> > You don’t have to fulfill requests from
> clients..
> > You dont have ppl scrutinizing your models,
> > estimates, etc
> > You have broader coverage on the buy-side and
> only
> > spend your time working on what you think will
> > make the most money…
>
> completely agree. I think buyside is way harder to
> get into though. I see sellside jobs posted
> regulary but buyside almost never. I think most
> people try to transition into the buyside from the
> sellside.
Exactly…thought that was pretty obvious. Very difficult to jump from non-FO (IB, ER) job to buyside. ER is a great gateway to buyside.
 
What has better odds of getting you to the buyside (specifically hedge funds): ER or IB?
 
definitely ER imo. You’re basically providing the research materials that the buyside uses.
 
Back
Top