Why would the shareholder’s equity be same under both the methods?
If assets of the joint venture are added to the BS, then how could equity be the same?
Think of this in the different stages of the investment
When initial investment is made
How these values change over time
Then after 1-year how the values change
Initial Investment
Equity Method = “one line consolidation”
So you are Firm X and you spend $100 buying a 20% interest in Firm A
Cash goes down by $100
Add a line item in Assets for the investment in Firm A = $100
1-year Later
Firm A reports $150 in total earnings for the year & paid $40 in dividends
Firm X adds its earnings pickup to the I/S ( $150 * 20% = $30 )
Firm X dividends from Firm A = $8
Firm X B/S line item change is then = $100 + $30 - $8 = $122 at year end
Firm X total change in retained earnings will be adding their net income (less dividends) to the balance sheet
When you do proportionate consolidation you are allocating your % ownerships of a firm’s assets & liabilities to the balance sheet. 1-year Later
Firm Y invests in Firm B*
* Same $100 amount and 20% ownership
Firm Y reports revenue, expenses, etc = their % ownership of Firm B on the I/S
Firm Y reports A/R, A/P, LT Debt, Inventory, etc = their % ownership of Firm B on the B/S
Firm Y retained earnings change = net income - dividends
Keep this in mind as well.
Net Income = Equity Method = Proportionate Consolidation
Shareholder Equity = Equity Method = Proportionate Consolidation ROE = same under both However most other ratios will be different!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.