In the Case Discussion, it says “the case notes that certain sections of the policy and procedure manual were unclear” so its a violation of Standard IV (C)
However, in the Case Facts, it says “Preston had stuck to the key elements rather than addressing all policies in detail”
- Could somebody explain how does not being detail implies “unclear”?? I mean i could have a 5 page policy vs. 100 page policy nowhere does the standard says whether detail is the way to go, yet the 5 page could be as effective..
- Under Standard IV (C) (on page-100 & 101), nowhere it says that policies have to be detail, in fact it says that it should be simple and easy to understand
However, in the Case Facts, it says “Preston had stuck to the key elements rather than addressing all policies in detail”
- Could somebody explain how does not being detail implies “unclear”?? I mean i could have a 5 page policy vs. 100 page policy nowhere does the standard says whether detail is the way to go, yet the 5 page could be as effective..
- Under Standard IV (C) (on page-100 & 101), nowhere it says that policies have to be detail, in fact it says that it should be simple and easy to understand