When we are given the interest expense rate, we can use that number in the equation yet when we are given interest expense as a dollar amount, we need to divide it by total assets? Intuitively, I would have assumed debt would have been in the denominator.
The question is, since when does interest expense dollars over total assets represent an interest expense rate? I understand that from an algebra standpoint assets need to be in the denominator but logically it is not jiving.
From Schweser:
Osnat Enterprise had the following financial data:
Operating profit margin 10%
Current ratio 2.5
Total asset turnover 2.4
Interest expense rate 6%
Leverage multiplier 2.0
Tax retention rate 0.80
What is Osnat’s return on equity?
A) 28.8%.
B) 13.0%
C) 14.4%
D) 15.0%
Your answer: A was correct!
ROE = [(10% × 2.4) - 6%] × (2.0)(0.80) = 28.8%
Thanks and I hope everyone is enjoying their day off from work as much as I am
The question is, since when does interest expense dollars over total assets represent an interest expense rate? I understand that from an algebra standpoint assets need to be in the denominator but logically it is not jiving.
From Schweser:
Osnat Enterprise had the following financial data:
Operating profit margin 10%
Current ratio 2.5
Total asset turnover 2.4
Interest expense rate 6%
Leverage multiplier 2.0
Tax retention rate 0.80
What is Osnat’s return on equity?
A) 28.8%.
B) 13.0%
C) 14.4%
D) 15.0%
Your answer: A was correct!
ROE = [(10% × 2.4) - 6%] × (2.0)(0.80) = 28.8%
Thanks and I hope everyone is enjoying their day off from work as much as I am