Assuming rates change as described by Akron and based on Exhibit 3, the impact on the portfolio as outlined in Module 6 would be most†likely†be a loss in value from changes in:
level and a loss from changes in steepness.
level and a gain from changes in steepness.
steepness and a gain from changes in curvature.
A parallel shift of the yield curve would result in a loss across each key rate duration given a sensitivity of 1.For example, a 100 basis point (bp) parallel shift would generate an approximately 4.7% loss in value. Aflattening of the yield curve in the long end would result in a loss given a sensitivity of 1.For example, a 100 bp decline in the 30 year key rate duration would result in a loss of approximately 2.9% (100*1*8.7*.333).There is no impact from curvature, since the curve did not “twist”.
Does ayone understand the response to this? How does a 100 BP decline in the yield curve is multiplied by both the Steepness factor (1), Key Rate duration (8.7) and some factor of (.333)?
level and a loss from changes in steepness.
level and a gain from changes in steepness.
steepness and a gain from changes in curvature.
A parallel shift of the yield curve would result in a loss across each key rate duration given a sensitivity of 1.For example, a 100 basis point (bp) parallel shift would generate an approximately 4.7% loss in value. Aflattening of the yield curve in the long end would result in a loss given a sensitivity of 1.For example, a 100 bp decline in the 30 year key rate duration would result in a loss of approximately 2.9% (100*1*8.7*.333).There is no impact from curvature, since the curve did not “twist”.
Does ayone understand the response to this? How does a 100 BP decline in the yield curve is multiplied by both the Steepness factor (1), Key Rate duration (8.7) and some factor of (.333)?