Q6 cant figure out about the yield curve factor model….
Ans: A parallel shift of the yield curve would result in a loss across each key rate duration given a sensitivity of 1. For example, a 100 basis point (bp) parallel shift would generate an approximately 4.7% loss in value. A flattening of the yield curve in the long end would result in a loss given a sensitivity of -1. For example, a 100 bp decline in the 30 year key rate duration would result in a loss of approximately 2.9% (-100*-1*-8.7*.333). There is no impact from curvature, since the curve did not “twist”.
I dun understand how to derive (-100*-1*-8.7*.333) anybdy can help?
Exhibit 3 – Factor Movements per One Standard Deviation Shift and
Portfolio Key Rate Durations
Year
5
10
30
Parallel
1
1
1
Steepness
1
0.5
-1
Curvature
0.5
0
1
Key Rate Durations
1.8
3.6
8.7
Assuming rates change as described by Akron and based on Exhibit 3, the impact on the portfolio as outlined in Module 6 would be most likely be a loss in value from changes in:
level and a gain from changes in steepness.
level and a loss from changes in steepness.
steepness and a gain from changes in curvature.
Ans: A parallel shift of the yield curve would result in a loss across each key rate duration given a sensitivity of 1. For example, a 100 basis point (bp) parallel shift would generate an approximately 4.7% loss in value. A flattening of the yield curve in the long end would result in a loss given a sensitivity of -1. For example, a 100 bp decline in the 30 year key rate duration would result in a loss of approximately 2.9% (-100*-1*-8.7*.333). There is no impact from curvature, since the curve did not “twist”.
I dun understand how to derive (-100*-1*-8.7*.333) anybdy can help?
Exhibit 3 – Factor Movements per One Standard Deviation Shift and
Portfolio Key Rate Durations
Year
5
10
30
Parallel
1
1
1
Steepness
1
0.5
-1
Curvature
0.5
0
1
Key Rate Durations
1.8
3.6
8.7
Assuming rates change as described by Akron and based on Exhibit 3, the impact on the portfolio as outlined in Module 6 would be most likely be a loss in value from changes in:
level and a gain from changes in steepness.
level and a loss from changes in steepness.
steepness and a gain from changes in curvature.