CFABLACKBELT
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
This has been driving me nuts all day.
On page 41 of CFA volume 6 (Bottom of page). It states that when an end user goes long and the dealer goes short: the long position will benefit when the rate increases, the short will benefit when the rate decreases.
My understanding is this happens b/c the long: locked in at a lower rate. The short locked in at a higher rate (assuming the rates go favorable ways for either party).
Now on page 66 at the bottom of the page: a trader has a futures contract in a t-bill.
If the rate increase the long looses, but the short gains...
Why?
I understand the math for page 66. But why does this happen? why the difference between Forward rate agreements on the Libor and the difference on the T-Bills?
Is it b/c T-bills subract 1 from the rate rather than add?
Thanks for clarifying this.
On page 41 of CFA volume 6 (Bottom of page). It states that when an end user goes long and the dealer goes short: the long position will benefit when the rate increases, the short will benefit when the rate decreases.
My understanding is this happens b/c the long: locked in at a lower rate. The short locked in at a higher rate (assuming the rates go favorable ways for either party).
Now on page 66 at the bottom of the page: a trader has a futures contract in a t-bill.
If the rate increase the long looses, but the short gains...
Why?
I understand the math for page 66. But why does this happen? why the difference between Forward rate agreements on the Libor and the difference on the T-Bills?
Is it b/c T-bills subract 1 from the rate rather than add?
Thanks for clarifying this.