yellayella
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
It says that in a depreciating local currency environment, the temporal method will have a lower gross profit margin than the all-current method.
but:
Fronttalk Company is a U.S. multinational firm with operations in several foreign countries. It has a 100% stake in a German subsidiary. The foreign subsidiary’s local currency has depreciated against the U.S. dollar over the latest financial statement reporting period. In addition, the German firm accounts for inventories using the last in, first out (LIFO) inventory cost-flow assumption and all purchases were made toward the end of the year. The gross profit margin as computed under the temporal method would most likely be:
A) higher than the same ratio computed under the current rate method.
B) equal to the same ratio computed under the current rate method.
C) lower than the same ratio computed under the current rate method.
B
The foreign company uses LIFO so new purchases are flowing to cost of goods sold (COGS) and most purchases occurred toward the end of the year, so the current rate of exchange is our best guess for the COGS account.
Since the local currency is depreciating, it is taking more foreign currency units to buy a dollar in the more recent periods and as a result, COGS as measured in U.S. dollars is lower and the gross profit margin is higher under the temporal method.
Depreciaton would be from 1.20 to 1.40, so it takes more of the FC to buy 1 $!
I just don’t get this, because i thought that with the temporal method you take the historical rate, so if the currency is depreciating, then with the temporal method using the historcal rate for COGS, would give us higher COGS (historcial rate) compared using the average rate.
So with higher COGS, gross income profit is lower!
So is the example above wrong?
but:
Fronttalk Company is a U.S. multinational firm with operations in several foreign countries. It has a 100% stake in a German subsidiary. The foreign subsidiary’s local currency has depreciated against the U.S. dollar over the latest financial statement reporting period. In addition, the German firm accounts for inventories using the last in, first out (LIFO) inventory cost-flow assumption and all purchases were made toward the end of the year. The gross profit margin as computed under the temporal method would most likely be:
A) higher than the same ratio computed under the current rate method.
B) equal to the same ratio computed under the current rate method.
C) lower than the same ratio computed under the current rate method.
B
The foreign company uses LIFO so new purchases are flowing to cost of goods sold (COGS) and most purchases occurred toward the end of the year, so the current rate of exchange is our best guess for the COGS account.
Since the local currency is depreciating, it is taking more foreign currency units to buy a dollar in the more recent periods and as a result, COGS as measured in U.S. dollars is lower and the gross profit margin is higher under the temporal method.
Depreciaton would be from 1.20 to 1.40, so it takes more of the FC to buy 1 $!
I just don’t get this, because i thought that with the temporal method you take the historical rate, so if the currency is depreciating, then with the temporal method using the historcal rate for COGS, would give us higher COGS (historcial rate) compared using the average rate.
So with higher COGS, gross income profit is lower!
So is the example above wrong?