I'm done. Here's my 2 cents of advice

namruts

New member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
I passed level III, and I'm outa here. I went 3/3 thanks to my hard work and my lucky star.

This forum has been a good source of info during the past three years, so I thought I'd leave my parting thoughts here in the level I forum. Hopefully I'll pay it forward by helping someone out there.

There is no secret to passing the exams because the biggest determining factors are your education, experience, and intelligence. I'm not greatly educated or experienced, so I studied my arse off to pass the exams. Others study very little, and some don't even buy the textbooks. You have to accurately appraise yourself to determine your optimal method of exam preparation. What works for some people will not work for everyone.

For first-timers, you should know that many exam questions include two or more parts. This greatly complicates matters. There are a lot more questions on each exam than you might think. The prep course questions don't accurately reflect this unusual question style. Be ready for it.

Also for first-timers, use the LOS. I was an idiot when I started this process, and I ignored the LOS at level I. Some of the material in the readings is not in the LOS. Don't study it. Some LOS are quite detailed, so be sure you understand EVERY single word and concept in the LOS.

I recommend buying the textbooks. I used Stalla for level I, and Schweser for levels II and III, in addition to purchasing all the textbooks. I didn't even open the Schweser books for level III, and I barely touched them at level II. (My employer paid for everything, so I purchased them just in case.) I used Stalla quite a bit at level I, and I was really unprepared for the exam. I got lucky and passed. For levels II and III, I read all the books and did all the problems. I passed II and III easily. Reading the books and completing the problems takes a lot of time and effort, but do you really want to risk taking the exams more than once? Many of the textbook problems are way more difficult than those found in the prep courses, and some of the textbook questions show up on the exams nearly verbatim.

Level I is basic finance that doesn't require much effort, relative to levels II and III. Level II contains a ton of math and technical analysis. Level III focuses on softer subjects that are misleading in their simplicity. Each level builds on the previous material, so take the exams consecutively if possible (i.e., don't skip a year). You will see level I material on the second and third exams, and level I and II material on the third exam.

For me, the most frustrating aspect of the exams was the sampling nature of the tests. At each level you are assigned a mountain of material, but the exam will include just a fraction of the material. The difficulty of the material was not nearly as troublesome as the amount of material. Some people try to guess what will be on the exam, focus on that material, and ignore or briefly study the remaining material. This is a dangerous strategy. For example, option pricing is a big part of the level II material, but the Black Sholes Merton material wasn't even on the level II exam in 2005!!! I spent weeks memorizing the hideous BSM equations, all for naught. However there was a question about a basic level I concept on the level II exam. Guessing what will be on the test is a mug's game. Study all the material as though it will be on the exam. Besides, if you get a charter, you will be expected to know all of it.

When should you start studying? There is no good answer to this very common question. Start early, and leave yourself plenty of time for final preparation. I studied for 9 weeks for level I, about 7 months for level II, and about 5 months for level III. But that really is irrelevant. You need to spend as much time as it takes to be �comfortable� with the material. You need more than a passing familiarity, and you need more than a basic understanding. You need to be comfortable discussing and questioning the material as though you were going to teach the material to other people. The exam questions are really, really difficult, and a basic understanding of the material is nowhere near adequate.

Final prep should include at least 2 weeks of practice exams. Do the CFAI exams. Do the Schweser exams. Cruise the Analystforum boards. Purchase the practice exam from your local CFA society, or the Boston society's exam (Boston produces a really good sample exam for each level). You shouldn't be learning the material right before the exam, rather you should be sharpening your test-taking skills.

What�s the best test-taking strategy? Should you blast through the exam and complete all the easy questions first? Or should you do each question in order, no matter the difficulty? Again, it depends on your strengths and weaknesses. There is no good answer to this question either. In fact, consider everyone�s advice, including mine, in light of your strengths and weaknesses.

Finally, relax on exam day. You�ve already passed or failed the exam when you open that test booklet. There�s nothing you can do on exam day to change your fate. Either you�re ready or you're not, based on your preparation. On exam day you�re merely exhibiting your preparation, nothing more or less. You�re not going to get smarter while you stare at question #38 for 10 minutes. Either you know it or you don�t know it. If you don�t know it, don�t freak out. The passing score for the exams must be somewhere around 60% to 70%. You can miss a lot of questions and still pass. So don�t lose your composure when you feel like you�ve totally missed a question. Erase it from your mind and move on, confident in your ability. But if you didn�t prepare very well, it would be time to start freaking out.

Good luck. I hope this repays my debts to this great website.

Jeff
 
Congratulations! Great advice and greatly appreciated.
 
9 weeks studying for Level I and passed!!!

Yeeshh.

Thanks for the advice. I was planning on reading the material (following the LOS) maybe two or three times. Then I have an Examwise book that I was going to use to practice some of the problems with maybe in the last 3 weeks. Then I have the Schweser review book which I'll probably go thru about 2 weeks from the exam.

Anybody else ever use the Examwise books??
 
Thank you, Great writeup...

It really does differ from person to person. The only similar strategy between them all, is to study your butt off...

After taking the December Level I, plan on taking the June Level II, but I am faced with a problem:

If I take Level I in December, I will not know the results till January. I could do one of the following things:

-Buy the Level II material right after taking the Level I exam (without knowing whether I have passed or not)
-Wait for the results and depending on the outcome, take it from there (Repeat the Level I or move on to Level II)

I guess I am answering my own question here. The only feasible way of accomplishing this task, is to study so much, that when I take the Level I exam, there will be no possible way that I can fail. Otherwise, I will be stuck for 2 months, not knowing where to turn.

Is the Level II exam that much harder than Level I? I know it is hard to quantify the dificulty increase, but I hope someone can put in perspective for me.

Best regards,
 
Many people think level II is the most difficult exam, and others think level III is the most difficult. In any case, they are both a lot more challenging than level I. There is a lot more material to cover, and the material is more difficult. Also, the material builds on itself as you progress, so the level II material is based on level I concepts, and level III is based on level I and II concepts. It just keeps getting worse.

Don't take the differences lightly. Level I is a walk in the part compared to levels II and III.

I took level I in December 2003, and I postponed level II until June 2005 because I had the same concerns as you. I studied for level II for nearly 7 months - I started before Thanksgiving in 2004. That was probably a little early, but not by much.
 
I'm taking the DEC exam. And hoping that I pass so that I can take LII in June. I'm thinking that because there are fewer people taking the December exam that the results will be out sooner. There's no LII or LIII. And because there are only about 15-20 places to take the exam, there should be much fewer exams to grade.

Regardless, I'm starting on LII material right after the Dec exam, regardless of the outcome. If I find out that I failed, then I can simply revert back to the LI material. Considering that I only have 4 months to prepare for December, if I fail then finding out in February won't be too late to restudy the LI material. Especially since I've already had 4 months of study.
 
wow, that is quite a lot...

I understand your concerns. I just hate to postpone the exam to 1.5 years from level I... it is going to be such a pain. However, it would probably guarantee that I pass the level II, if I actually start studying a year and a half before (lightly of course, no heavy lifting till about 9 months away)...

In Level I, the FSA stuff is mostly new to me, so I find it very hard in that regard... However, the quant stuff is very familiar to me since college and common sense, so when they build on the concepts, it is fairly straight forward. What I am thinking of is that Level II is mostly new stuff being built on the familiar concepts of Level I.

Am I off base here? Through this logic, although the second Level is harder in terms of concepts, it is a build on the Level I base...
 
The level II material takes regression several steps further. The FSA material takes a long, long time to plow through. The pension accounting could encompass an entire semester of graduate study. The options and derivatives material is highly complex, and there are several dozen scary equations and arcane concepts. Of course this is just my opinion, but I'd estimate level II is two or three times more challenging than level I. You'll notice when you start preparing for level II that the game has been taken to a whole new level.

Jeff
 
Thanks Jeff... KIT... stop back from time to time... good advice... I think I read something else from you (it was somewhat similar to what you wrote above) that I used to structure a good portion of my study plan from... This forum is incredible... alot of us are in this thing because the community we have at work does not exactly reflect our motivated interests (i.e. we're lacking a good group of peers) -- this forum kind of fills a bit of that void while we strive for progress at work/life/whatever. Congrats and good luck to you.
 
This was one of the best advoice I got on this topic. Thank you once again.
 
Namruts:

You say you are not greatky educated or experinced - please share a bit more about your background i.e. education and what do you do for a living.

Also, any motivational tips to keep ploghing through - gracias amigo!!!
 
I might have exaggerated my ignorance a little, but I have far less experience than many candidates. I have a BS in Business Admin, but I graduated from college 12 years ago. I've been a bank examiner for 6 years, and I was a commercial loan officer for 6 years prior to that. I was also a registered rep (Series 7) during my banking career. But my commercial banking experience allowed minimal exposure to capital markets, so my knowledge of derivatives, currencies, economics, and quant was very limited. On the other hand, I have tons of experience reading financial statements, analyzing bonds, and understanding interest rates, market risks, and credit risk. My preparation was based on my strengths and weaknesses. I briefly studied the FSA and fixed income material, but I spent months studying derivatives, pension accounting, quant topics, and many other areas too.

Jeff
 
Thanks a lot for your comments Jeff. Very much apreciated, and puts everything into perspective.

If I pass Level 1, I will still try to shoot for Level 2 in 6 months. I will just have to go out less and spend weekends in more.

If it does not work out and I fail. Then all I have wasted is the registration fee and half the cost of materials. The way I see it, it is just pennies compared to passing the exam in less time.
 
Back
Top