lawrence90sg
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
Hi Guys,
I don understand the particular 2 statements well. Can you help to provide some clarity on here.
Statement 1: I/R increase
When the duration of assets is larger than the duration of liabilities, the duration gap is positive. In this situation, if interest rates rise, assets will lose more value than liabilities, thus reducing the value of the firm’s equity.
How come the net effect is different? When asset maturities is longer than liabilties.
Thanks
I don understand the particular 2 statements well. Can you help to provide some clarity on here.
Statement 1: I/R increase
- Changes in net interest margins: The bank financial intermediation business model entails maturity transformation (i.e., borrowing short term and lending long term); thus, interest rate assets have a longer maturity than liabilities. In other words, bank balance sheets are typically characterized by a maturity mismatch. If there is a steepening of the yield curve, the net interest margin would be expected to increase due to the maturity mismatch. Meanwhile, long-term assets have higher incremental returns than the incremental costs of short-term liabilities.
When the duration of assets is larger than the duration of liabilities, the duration gap is positive. In this situation, if interest rates rise, assets will lose more value than liabilities, thus reducing the value of the firm’s equity.
How come the net effect is different? When asset maturities is longer than liabilties.
Thanks