either way what was the right way calculating it? Is it the no-growth P/E, P/E for growth or no-growth + growth. I was confused as to what they were asking.
No that’s not what they were looking for.
Intinsic P/E = Tangible P/E + Franchise P/E
They gave you franchise P/E (I think it was 5ish) so you just had to compute tangible as 1/r which was about 5ish. So the Intrinsic P/E was like 10.8
I could be way out in left field with this but I distinctly remember a question asking “what is the intrinsic VALUE” of the company, not intrinsic p/e. i did 1/r + (1/r-1/roe)x(g/r-g) and came up with an answer that was listed. but now i’m thinking i should have taken that number and multiplied it by net income of the company to get intrinsic VALUE… ? can anyone clarify?
may be i was day dreaming but i vividly remembered the question was about intrinsic not justified. i struggled with it for about 5 minutes and out of desperation I randomly picked one choice (may be 10.6 or 10.8….something like that).
Yeah there were two questions:
1) Asked from intrinsic P/E = Tangible P/E + Franchise P/E (which was given no need to compute)
2) Justified Trailing P/E = 1-b(1+g)/r-g
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.