MAD vs standard deviation

K

kaia_p

New member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Hi All,
while doing assessments found the below statement about MAD and standard deviation which I find confusing. Can you please help to explain the relationship between MAD and stanrdard deviation.
Much appreciated, cheers!
The least accurate statement about measures of dispersion for a distribution is that the:
range provides no information about the shape of the data distribution.
mean absolute deviation will be either less than or equal to the standard deviation.
arithmetic average of the deviations around the mean will be equal to one.
 
Mean absolute deviation is: (1/n)*sum[abs(x-xbar)]
Standard deviation is : (1/n)*sum[(x-xbar)^2]
Because there is a square in the term for standard deviation, it will always be at least as large as the mean absolute deviation.
Think of it this way, for MAD, you are summing all of the deviations from the mean (irrespective of negative/positive).
For standard deviation, you are squaring each of those distances first, and then adding them.
 
You should also know that the sum of the deviations from the mean is zero, because of the way in which the mean is calculated (and some other properties would help you prove this). This would imply that the sum of the deviations from the mean is zero, and therefore, the arithmetic average is zero for these deviations (so the third statement is least accurate). This could help you with process of elimination also.
 
dwheats wrote:
Standard deviation is : (1/n)*sum[(x-xbar)^2]
Because there is a square in the term for standard deviation, it will always be at least as large as the mean absolute deviation.
Click to expand...
Not correct - what you’ve put as the formula for the SD is actually the formula for variance. If you took the square root, then you have SD. So, since you’re squaring terms then taking the square root, the second statement does not hold.
And even if you were simply looking at squared deviations vs. absolute deviations, if the deviation is less than one, the squared deviation would be smaller than the absolute deviation.
But the third choice is clearly least accurate - the sum of the raw deviations will be zero, not one.
 
But I guess since you are taking the sqrt(n) for SD, the SD will still be at least as large as MAD.
 
Not necessarily - you’re squaring, taking the average square, and then taking the root.
I can’t recall the derivation to show the relationship of the square root of the average squared deviation to the average absolute deviation. Any math jocks want to take a stab at it? I believe this would be the relationship of the L1 and L2 norms, if I recall my grad school probability theory.
 
busprof wrote:Not necessarily - you’re squaring, taking the average square, and then taking the root.
I can’t recall the derivation to show the relationship of the square root of the average squared deviation to the average absolute deviation. Any math jocks want to take a stab at it? I believe this would be the relationship of the L1 and L2 norms, if I recall my grad school probability theory.
Click to expand...
Yeah … necessarily.
I’d have to fiddle a little to come up with the proof; suffice it to say that the standard deviation is always at least as large as the MAD.
 
^not if the deviations are less than 1. Then MAD will be greater than stdev.
 
Greenman72 wrote:^not if the deviations are less than 1. Then MAD will be greater than stdev.
Click to expand...
You need to work harder. If x1 = 0, x2 = ½, and x3 = 1, then:
  • MAD = ⅓ = 0.333…
  • σ = √(1/6) = 0.408248…
 
S2000magician wrote:
Greenman72 wrote:^not if the deviations are less than 1. Then MAD will be greater than stdev.
Click to expand...
You need to work harder. If x1 = 0, x2 = ½, and x3 = 1, then:
  • MAD = ⅓ = 0.333…
  • σ = √(1/6) = 0.408248…
Click to expand...
Hmmm…you’re right. I was working under the impression that a deviation of .2 = MAD of .2, and stdev of .04 (because the .2 is squared, and is therefore smaller than MAD).
But I forgot that you have to take the sqrt of the .04 again at the end. So I guess stdev is always greater than MAD.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top