Min Passing score

I doubt that even L1 or L2 mps is ever 69%!! So, no chance!
 
StallionDis wrote:its just like playing a sport. Any Tom Dick and Harry can perform well when the pressue is not on them.
Click to expand...
You’re obviously familiar with more competent Toms, Dicks, and Harrys than I am; I know many Toms, Dicks, and Harrys who cannot perform well under any circumstances, pressure or no.
 
S2000magician wrote:
StallionDis wrote:its just like playing a sport. Any Tom Dick and Harry can perform well when the pressue is not on them.
Click to expand...
You’re obviously familiar with more competent Toms, Dicks, and Harrys than I am; I know many Toms, Dicks, and Harrys who cannot perform well under any circumstances, pressure or no.
Click to expand...
hahah, agreed
 
This is just my guess but my bet is that CFA test writers generally know what they are doing beforehand. It’s like the SAT. They know what median score they are aiming for. You don’t see the SAT Median Score jumping around a lot do you?
I think MPS initially is set close to 60. However if the Institute ends up throwing out a few questions (i.e., giving everybody credit for them) it could throw off the MPS. I think (again, my guess) is normally there are a few vague questions thrown out to where the MPS ends up being in the low 60’s.
 
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you guys. You’re intelligent enough to make it through two levels of the CFA program, presumably an undergraduate degree, and have the ability to be gainfully employed….and you’re relying on and relaying your “assessment” of what the MPS is? No one other than CFAI has enough information to create a credible assessment of the MPS - and you would never know if you’re right anyway! What a waste of time…
This is why I dropped off the forum long ago.
 
popchampagne wrote:
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you guys. You’re intelligent enough to make it through two levels of the CFA program, presumably an undergraduate degree, and have the ability to be gainfully employed….and you’re relying on and relaying your “assessment” of what the MPS is? No one other than CFAI has enough information to create a credible assessment of the MPS - and you would never know if you’re right anyway! What a waste of time…
This is why I dropped off the forum long ago.
Click to expand...
I’m in general agreement, minus the harsh language and the fact that I’m still around.
 
popchampagne wrote:
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you guys. You’re intelligent enough to make it through two levels of the CFA program, presumably an undergraduate degree, and have the ability to be gainfully employed….and you’re relying on and relaying your “assessment” of what the MPS is? No one other than CFAI has enough information to create a credible assessment of the MPS - and you would never know if you’re right anyway! What a waste of time…
This is why I dropped off the forum long ago.
Click to expand...
Even then, intelligent people still watch retarded soap operas and reality shows or even drool over vain, unschooled vegas-quality hotties… and I deeply suspect you do too…
 
popchampagne wrote:
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you guys. You’re intelligent enough to make it through two levels of the CFA program, presumably an undergraduate degree, and have the ability to be gainfully employed….and you’re relying on and relaying your “assessment” of what the MPS is? No one other than CFAI has enough information to create a credible assessment of the MPS - and you would never know if you’re right anyway! What a waste of time…
This is why I dropped off the forum long ago.
Click to expand...
Welcome back to Analyst Forum!
 
popchampagne wrote:
Seriously, WTF is wrong with you guys. You’re intelligent enough to make it through two levels of the CFA program, presumably an undergraduate degree, and have the ability to be gainfully employed….and you’re relying on and relaying your “assessment” of what the MPS is? No one other than CFAI has enough information to create a credible assessment of the MPS - and you would never know if you’re right anyway! What a waste of time…
This is why I dropped off the forum long ago.
Click to expand...
A bunch of people using various inputs, research and analysis to try estimating an unknown future result… gee, you would have thought we were on a forum for analysts or something. Oh wait…..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top