archived_user
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
Guys,
sorry in advance. I have gone through the answer on the above question and I do reckon that It does make perfect sense.
My issue here is that I always tend to build up some solid rationale to draw answers, in this case through a formula.
Specifically on the above question I simply assumed the following :
1. To estimate the current (potential) credit risk on currency forward I use the following formula :
[S/ (1+Rfc) ] - [ F/ (a+Rdc]; and
2. Given the above should show the LONG perspective;
3. If LONG perspective is POSITIVE hence LONG should BEAR credit risk.
Specifically on the above exercise I did
17.5 / (1,01)^2 - 15/ (1,10)^2 = 4.75 POSITIVE! BUT : well given RR shorted the forward it doesn’t bear the credit Risk, counterparty does….
what’s wrong with my application of the formula and how I can reconcile with the right answer?
thanks for your help,
sorry in advance. I have gone through the answer on the above question and I do reckon that It does make perfect sense.
My issue here is that I always tend to build up some solid rationale to draw answers, in this case through a formula.
Specifically on the above question I simply assumed the following :
1. To estimate the current (potential) credit risk on currency forward I use the following formula :
[S/ (1+Rfc) ] - [ F/ (a+Rdc]; and
2. Given the above should show the LONG perspective;
3. If LONG perspective is POSITIVE hence LONG should BEAR credit risk.
Specifically on the above exercise I did
17.5 / (1,01)^2 - 15/ (1,10)^2 = 4.75 POSITIVE! BUT : well given RR shorted the forward it doesn’t bear the credit Risk, counterparty does….
what’s wrong with my application of the formula and how I can reconcile with the right answer?
thanks for your help,