I have Seen a result of my friend and that was the Most unbelievable result i have everrrrrr seen and it is
alternative < 50
quantitative 50-70
and rest of all the 8 subjects are above 70+ how can it be a Band 10
i was shocked totally and u will too…
Assuming this person barely got >70% in the 8 subjects and did horribly in the two above, it’s quite easy to believe:
Let’s say:
AI 2/8
Quant 15/28
Deriv 9/12
PM 9/12
CF 15/20
FSA 34/48
Equity 17/24
Ec. 17/24
FI 20/28
Ethics 26/36
Total score 164/240 = 68.3333%
Assuming MPS was 69%, he would have failed.
tj2001 Wrote:
——————————————————-
> Assuming this person barely got >70% in the 8
> subjects and did horribly in the two above, it’s
> quite easy to believe:
>
> Let’s say:
>
> AI 2/8
> Quant 15/28
>
> Deriv 9/12
> PM 9/12
> CF 15/20
>
> FSA 34/48
> Equity 17/24
> Ec. 17/24
> FI 20/28
> Ethics 26/36
>
> Total score 164/240 = 68.3333%
>
> Assuming MPS was 69%, he would have failed.
True - this gives an idea that MPS was really higher than our thoughts
I failed as a band 10 scoring <50 in Economics, Quant, and AI, 50-70 in FRA and PM and >70 everything else. To think that I tanked a quarter of the exam makes me believe I scored at the extremes in my strong and weak areas.
Agreed!
You guys are wasting your time working through all these permutations. The intervals are too broad. It won’t change anything anyway! Hard as it may be.. its best to move on
yodacaia Wrote:
——————————————————-
> There is a BIG difference between a 71 and a 100
> in a large topic. The 70+ bracket just doesnt
> tell us enough.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.