My exam experience

vstolin

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2026
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Hi, everybody.
June exam is over and I wanted to share my view on it. I�m not going to release any details but rather share my experience. Please do not hit me hard for this. Everything expressed below is just my opinion.

Part I. Overall Exam.

Exam organization:
Exam was well organized (at least in my location) and I think it helped a lot. I was not nervous at all. Make sure you have only �things� allowed by CFAI and you are not going to get in trouble. I had 2 calculators, pencils, sharpener and earplugs. Just bring them in without any bag or even a zip-lock. Earplugs were not necessary at all as well as pencil sharpener. I used about 10 pencils for both parts. Unfortunately, CFAI does not show the format of the answer sheet. If I saw it before I think it would be easier for me to adjust to the process. But my conclusion is that regular pencil is much better than mechanical to fill in the answers. My pencils were too sharp so I even had to intentionally dull them a little.

Exam perception:
You may hear people saying that second part is easier, especially due to the fact that you do not have so much stress. May be it happened because I was not nervous, but I found second part harder than the first. Questions were harder for me plus I was already tired. I talked to some people after the exam. Even though few of them had different opinion, majority agreed that the first part was easier. If I had to compare the complexity of the exam to the tests that I took I would rank then from most to least complex:

1. Schweser book 7 (I had low 60�s on it)
2. Part II of the real exam
3. Schweser book 6 (I had mid 70�s to low 80�s) and Part I of the real exam
4. CFAI sample exam which I purchased for $50 (I got 83 on it)

Real exam is much more analytical and less calculations than Schweser. My calculator power went on auto-save a couple of times because I did not use it. Nothing crazy like pooled variance or 3-asset portfolio stdev. Be ready to a lot of qualitative analytical questions. I did not see a single question in the first part that I did not understand at all and may be only 2 or 3 in the second part. Also logical chains in the second part were much longer. If part I was something like: �If A goes up what will happen to B and C� then part II was something like: �If company uses A and B how the change in X is going to affect Y and Z in comparison to the company which is using C and D�? Also I was more confident selecting the answer on part I than on part II. This does not mean that I selected the right answer. I was just more confident identifying which answer I�m going to pick versus fighting between 2 or sometimes 3 different choices in part II. Timing was sufficient. I have an average speed and I did not have enough time to do a Schweser exam in 3 hours. I usually marked 3 to 5 answers randomly on book 6 and 10 to 12 on book 7 to stay whithin 3 hours. On real exam I had about 10 minutes left after finishing both parts. I think this is due to the shorter questions and less calculations.

Conclusion:
Some people who passed exam before suggested that they were absolutely confident that they failed. My feelings are not that tragic. It is still a long waiting but I feel about 50/50 on this. I guessed a lot, but I hope it was not that bad.

I was going to publish more detailed opinion on each section (without specific questions obviously) but I�m not sure if this is helpful to other people. Exams do change from year to year, but if somebody is interested reply to this message and I will post part II later.

Good luck everybody.
Enjoy your study free life.
 
really good summary. agree with most everything. good luck.
 
i couldnt agree more with your opinions.....

The exam was much more non-calculative than i had expected. I can almost count on my fingers how many times i had to use the calculator, so that should speak for itself.

Ethics on both parts were quite straight forward, with the exception of a few curveballs (eg; soliciting clients, but also being personal friends with them, etc etc).....

Economics was relatively straight forward, but NOT easy.

Quant was surprisingly straight forward and not many calculations....

FSA was where i got screwed as i am generally weak in accounting to begin with. There were times when i was looking at the question and seriously wondering what i had gotten myself into. I recall questions that would not only test 2 but 3-4 concepts in one question. Alot of double negatives threw me off.

PM was more difficult than i had expected. Guess on many.

Overall, the exam was fairly tough, but not outrageously tough. If i failed, its because i didnt study hard enough, not because the CFAI is out to get us. The 2nd half of the exam was much tougher for me personally, but not because the questions were necessarily harder, but mostly from fatigue and mental strain from the morning session. There were questions that seemed relentless and difficult to grasp, but its most likely on concepts you already know, but cant tie the knots together because of being burnt out after the 5th hour of testing. Overall, guessed on alot, wouldnt be surprised if i FAILED. I would be extremely surprised (and pleasantly) if i miraculously passed, but i doubt this is the case.

The wording on this test was TOUGH. For those who think that people in China/India with no english background and can count on their quantitative skills to pass this exam will be in for a surprise. The girl sitting beside me was from China, and i guess she felt so devasated after the first paper she decided not to show up for the second paper. Someone told me the wording was more difficult than December, but thats their opinions...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Sunday, June 4, 2006 at 12:01PM by tekara.
 
Ya, this test is tricky, no doubt, but it test how well you know the material. If you cram in the last month you will probibly not pass. If you put in the effort, even 250 hours or less depending on your background and know your stuff reasonable well I think you have a good shot at passing. The questions are not long, but they ask questions in different ways and there are twists so you have to turn a concept or two for a question on it's side or backward to answer it.

I remember when I finished the first exam I was warped back into reality, literally, when the invistigator said to put down your pencils, I knew I was in a deep state of concentration. IMO learning the material in the conventional sense is not good enough. I.e. a major difference between this exam and the a Canadian Securities Institute exam is the CSI's exam test that you have learnt it, but you have to know how to apply the concept liberally to different type of questions. You also have to be smart enough to figure out the curveballs that they give you. Having said that the curveballs are not deadly, but you need to work through them.
 
Hello guys, just one question,

I am about to start preparing the Jun07 L1 exam (as full-time working, no much time available), and would like to know what would you advise me to study: either curriculum or schweser notes?

thanks
 
Back
Top