cindylaurel
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
I have a question regarding example 10 in the CFA book (page 81 in the printed version), which has to do with operating vs. capital (finance) leasing. In the example, they provide three options:
1. Buy the equipment and finance the purchase with new debt
2. Lease the equipment under an operating lease
3. Lease the equipment under a capital (finance) lease
In the example, there is absolutely no difference between Options 1 and 3 in any of the financial statement impacts or the financial ratios. Can someone tell me if this is always the case and if not, what circumstances would cause the two options to have a different impact in the financial statements? If there actually is never any difference in the two, then what might cause a company to choose one over the other?
1. Buy the equipment and finance the purchase with new debt
2. Lease the equipment under an operating lease
3. Lease the equipment under a capital (finance) lease
In the example, there is absolutely no difference between Options 1 and 3 in any of the financial statement impacts or the financial ratios. Can someone tell me if this is always the case and if not, what circumstances would cause the two options to have a different impact in the financial statements? If there actually is never any difference in the two, then what might cause a company to choose one over the other?