Order of Study and Mock exams

confused2010 wrote:
Nana—- in India means either ” no no ” or maternal grandfather :D:D
thanks for your suggestions.appreciate it.
In Japanese it means 7
you’re welcome.
^_^
 
Palantir wrote:
I disagree with whoever said order is not important. You should read the materials in order, don’t skip around, it will immediately organize your thinking and there will be a clear progression through the material as you go through it. Otherwise, you’ll disproportionately study for one section vs another.
Hmm… i agree and disagree with you at the same time.
I think it’s good to read in sequence because in actual exam, the order of questions follow largely in the order of the curriculum (with the exception of Ethics in L3 which only appears in PM).
And reading in sequence also make sure you do not miss any topics.
However, in regards to time managment, even if you read in sequence there is no guarentee that you will time manage better because many topics toward the end may take you longer to understand/ read, so if you go through the first half of the curriculum thinking you still have half of the time left for half of the curriculum, you may actually be behind.
 
IMO the order of the material for LIII is methodically laid out – just save Ethics for the end. Starts analyzing the psychological biases and intuitions of investors, and then moves on to Individual vs. Institutional IPS. After that each asset class is analyzed separately, and in the end we’re left with trading and performance measurement. I would definitely recommend reading the curriculum in order.
As others have said, I think you should practice AM sessions from 2008-2013. PM sessions will be harder to come across.
 
tozerrt wrote:
.
As others have said, I think you should practice AM sessions from 2008-2013. PM sessions will be harder to come across.
But interestingly, most people performed better in the PM section, so perhaps people need more practices for AM than PM anyway.
 
Back
Top