In the correction they say we should prefer 25-delta strangle over 50-delta straddle because the straddle, being at-the-money, is more expensive than the strangle being out-of-the-money.
However, the goal is to profit from expected volatility with no mention of minimizing upfront costs.
Aren’t 50-delta options more sensitive to the price movement than 25-dela options?
If so, wouldn’t our expected profit from the volatil market more important with the 50-delta options than the 25-options?
However, the goal is to profit from expected volatility with no mention of minimizing upfront costs.
Aren’t 50-delta options more sensitive to the price movement than 25-dela options?
If so, wouldn’t our expected profit from the volatil market more important with the 50-delta options than the 25-options?