I think I might be wrong on all this. There is no linear relationship because of that fixed variable. it distorts the timeline of growth too much before reaching a steady state.
I tried $5,000 income fixed and $8,000 expenses that grows 10% a year with a portfolio value of $100,000.
The required rate of return should have been 3%+10% = 13%. But after running an excel simulation, the number is actually 16.79% to keep prinicpal from drying up over a long period of time. There’s a logarithmic relationship that could be applied here, beyond my scope, and the material.
8% is also wrong using your example, the actual number is much higher, if the client wishes to preserve principal. Maybe someone else can chime in.
Edit: If you were just asking about CF1 (by this year end), then do not include inflation if the amount is a current expense. If the expenses were incurred last year for that amount, you may grow it with inflation for this year.