I felt similar after reading the comments, and thought I do not want to be fooled by false impressions. Hence, I put a list together where I tried to recap and split by following 3 topics: 1. Certain to be correct; 2. Not 100% certain; and 3. 100% certain that I was wrong. In order to be objective, I checked those subjects and read the respective books. After doing this, I figured out that I have overall about 20 on the positive side (including whole questions/sections like for example Ethics, etc. and sub-questions, around 5 (including only sub-questions), where I am not certain if I made some mistakes (there I missed some points), and last but not least 5 sub-questions, where I am 100% certain that I made mistakes. With that I have to mention, that I finished both am and pm. I was struggling with am in terms of time (I answered the first 3-5 questions very detailed and realized that I need to speed up to finish, which I have done.However this caused me to have some mistakes on the questions 6-8. Towards the end I figured out that I would have more time and performed again well on questions 9-11). The PM part I could have done faster, however I decided to calculate not only the correct answer but to calculate also the wrong ones if I was not sure. I thinks what makes the difference are 2 points: My sessions included old mocks since 2009, Schweser including online q-database and most of those twice, where I was not sure (some of the those topics appeared also this year). And most important, recap in the morning exactly 1 specific topic, which was tested heavily during the whole exam (this was by chance, because I imagined that this could be tested). For those, who are now unsecure I would recommend to make a list and be objective. Not sure how they will grade it.