Hi everyone,
I am having difficulties with this question from Investopedia:
Which of the following statements is (are) true when interpreting ratios that represent the company’s growth potential?
I. A company’s growth rate will increase as its dividend payout ratio decreases.
II. The higher the level of preferred dividends, the higher the payout ratio to common equity holders.
III. The retention ratio is the inverse of the dividend payout ratio.
IV. The payout ratio can never be as high as the retention ratio.
A) I and II only
B) IV only
C) III and IV only
The correct answer is a).
I don’t really see why II is correct. Why should the amount of preferred dividends affect the payout ratio to common equity holders. As far as I understand, the dividends for preferred shares are “set it in stone”, that is as long as the company is doing well, the preferred dividends are constant (say $8 and par value of $100, so 8%). They are not increased upwards if the company did particularly well that year, so I do not see why their level should affec the common dividends.
Does anyone have an idea?
Thanks,
Tartaglia
I am having difficulties with this question from Investopedia:
Which of the following statements is (are) true when interpreting ratios that represent the company’s growth potential?
I. A company’s growth rate will increase as its dividend payout ratio decreases.
II. The higher the level of preferred dividends, the higher the payout ratio to common equity holders.
III. The retention ratio is the inverse of the dividend payout ratio.
IV. The payout ratio can never be as high as the retention ratio.
A) I and II only
B) IV only
C) III and IV only
The correct answer is a).
I don’t really see why II is correct. Why should the amount of preferred dividends affect the payout ratio to common equity holders. As far as I understand, the dividends for preferred shares are “set it in stone”, that is as long as the company is doing well, the preferred dividends are constant (say $8 and par value of $100, so 8%). They are not increased upwards if the company did particularly well that year, so I do not see why their level should affec the common dividends.
Does anyone have an idea?
Thanks,
Tartaglia