Hi guys,
A Q here from the textbook. I am not really following the logic and wasn’t able to find any basis to think with right out the textbook.
The client already have a target asset allocation; but the answer deviates from it greatly with at age 30, 100% investment in stocks.
Can someone please help and explain the logic behind it?
A Q here from the textbook. I am not really following the logic and wasn’t able to find any basis to think with right out the textbook.
The client already have a target asset allocation; but the answer deviates from it greatly with at age 30, 100% investment in stocks.
Can someone please help and explain the logic behind it?