desmond1099
New member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 0
- 0
Thank you so much to manowar, PBR & revenant…Finally I got some1 to clear my confusion…
So can I conclude that we shall follow the errata rather than the answers to the problems at the end of the chapter??
And thus, the “supposingly correct” calculation and solution for the above Q should be:-
Initial investmet
= Margin requirement + Purchase Commissions
= (.45 * $5600) + $155
= $2675—-(A)
Ending value/proceeds
= (Difference between stock price X No. of Shares) - Dividends (If any) - Sell Commission
= ($11*100) - ($2.50*100) - $145
= $705—-(B)
The rate of return on investment
=A/B%
=$705/$2675
=26.36%
BUT come think of it, is that logic to deduct both the purchase & sale commission from from the numerator, i.e. we are trying to get the “NET PROCEEDS/PROFIT” from the investment after take into consideration ALL outflows?
Come on, let’s argue…
So can I conclude that we shall follow the errata rather than the answers to the problems at the end of the chapter??
And thus, the “supposingly correct” calculation and solution for the above Q should be:-
Initial investmet
= Margin requirement + Purchase Commissions
= (.45 * $5600) + $155
= $2675—-(A)
Ending value/proceeds
= (Difference between stock price X No. of Shares) - Dividends (If any) - Sell Commission
= ($11*100) - ($2.50*100) - $145
= $705—-(B)
The rate of return on investment
=A/B%
=$705/$2675
=26.36%
BUT come think of it, is that logic to deduct both the purchase & sale commission from from the numerator, i.e. we are trying to get the “NET PROCEEDS/PROFIT” from the investment after take into consideration ALL outflows?
Come on, let’s argue…