sachin_patel
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
This is Patel’s comment:
Patel indicated that his risk tolerance would increase significantly if he knew that an investment had the unanimous support of Garnier’s Private Wealth Investment Committee.
[question removed by admin]
My answer was C (the comment fails to recognize Gambler’s fallacy).
But the textbook answer is social proof.
I don’t understand their explanation. Any better explanation?
Thanks
Patel indicated that his risk tolerance would increase significantly if he knew that an investment had the unanimous support of Garnier’s Private Wealth Investment Committee.
[question removed by admin]
My answer was C (the comment fails to recognize Gambler’s fallacy).
But the textbook answer is social proof.
I don’t understand their explanation. Any better explanation?
Thanks