pierovic18
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
You are considering purchasing rental property that's priced at $3,000,000. After accounting for the likelihood of financing 75% of this purchase with a 10-year loan at 8%, you estimate the following net cash flows over the next five years: Furthermore, you estimate that once you sell the property in five years, you will get a net proceed of $600,000 after paying off the mortgage. If your required rate of return is 11% for this particular investment, should you go ahead and purchase it?
You are considering purchasing rental property that's priced at $3,000,000. After accounting for the likelihood of financing 75% of this purchase with a 10-year loan at 8%, you estimate the following net cash flows over the next five years: Furthermore, you estimate that once you sell the property in five years, you will get a net proceed of $600,000 after paying off the mortgage. If your required rate of return is 11% for this particular investment, should you go ahead and purchase it?
Year 1. 120000
year 2 135000
year 3 152000
Year 4 168000.
year 5 177000
(a) No, because the NPV is -$2,099,404.
(b) No, because the NPV is -$205,475.
(c) Yes, because the NPV is $900,596.
(d) Yes, because the NPV is $150,596.
correct answer is d. Your answer was incorrect!
Explanation:
NPV= -(25% of 3,000,0000) + 120000(discount)+ 135000(disocunted) ........+ 600000(dicsounted in 6th year)
Why do they use the 25% of 300000 and not the whole amount of the money
You are considering purchasing rental property that's priced at $3,000,000. After accounting for the likelihood of financing 75% of this purchase with a 10-year loan at 8%, you estimate the following net cash flows over the next five years: Furthermore, you estimate that once you sell the property in five years, you will get a net proceed of $600,000 after paying off the mortgage. If your required rate of return is 11% for this particular investment, should you go ahead and purchase it?
Year 1. 120000
year 2 135000
year 3 152000
Year 4 168000.
year 5 177000
(a) No, because the NPV is -$2,099,404.
(b) No, because the NPV is -$205,475.
(c) Yes, because the NPV is $900,596.
(d) Yes, because the NPV is $150,596.
correct answer is d. Your answer was incorrect!
Explanation:
NPV= -(25% of 3,000,0000) + 120000(discount)+ 135000(disocunted) ........+ 600000(dicsounted in 6th year)
Why do they use the 25% of 300000 and not the whole amount of the money