Hi
Lets suppose a stock is currently trading at its intrinsic value of $100 and the required return on equity is 10%. The reading on valuation concept implies that the target price at the end of the year will be 100*1.10 = $110 (assuming no dividends). My question is why would someone, after a year, pay $110 to buy the stock when its true value is only $100? I’m I missing something from the logic of required return or intrinsic value?
Lets suppose a stock is currently trading at its intrinsic value of $100 and the required return on equity is 10%. The reading on valuation concept implies that the target price at the end of the year will be 100*1.10 = $110 (assuming no dividends). My question is why would someone, after a year, pay $110 to buy the stock when its true value is only $100? I’m I missing something from the logic of required return or intrinsic value?