moosetopher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BA
>
> I think this is what you are looking for
>
> Expected Return on portfolio is 25%
> SD = 35%
> Shortfall Return Level (Rl) = 2.5%
>
> SFRatio = (25-.025)/.35 = .6429
>
> Now if you want find the probability that this
> portfolio will return less than shortfall return
> level, simply take 1-N(SFRratio) = 1-N(.6429) =
> 1-.7389 = .2611 = 26.11%
>
> N(SFRatio) denotes Z = .6429 from the table (i.e.
> 73.89% of area under the curve above 2.5% return)
> the remainder is the probability that you fall
> short.
>
> Ya Dig!
My apologies for bumping an old thread.
Same as the original topic, the question is on page 221 of book1:
Portfolio A has a safety-ratio of 1.3 with a thresthold return of 2 percent. What is the shortfall risk for a target return of 2 percent?
I intuitively chose P(Z<1.3)=.903 (wrong)
The correct answer is mentioned by the poster above: 1-N(SFRatio)= 1-.903= 0.0968 (correct)
My question is why are we taking the right tail? To my understanding, P(Z<1.3) represents the probability our returns would be less than threshold(of 2%) while P(Z>1.3) represent our returns above threshhold. I guess I'm going this the wrong way, anyone care to enlighten me?
