If you have no experience in Finance, yeah. I mean you might be at the higher end of the range, but nobody cares if you have a masters and no experience.
Now if you were formerly a market researcher who is a stats wiz, or a department manager who had responsibility for a multimillion dollar budget, you were probably making much more than 50k and may be able to negotiate a higher base.
However, if you don’t have any relevant finance or industry experience, an MS alone is just going to get you a job, not a high salary. Your only going to get entry level responsibility anyways. No manager who’s ass is on the line is going to just trust someone with only textbook/classroom experience to manage any of the financial functions that pay bank.
The MS with two or three years in the trenches cranking out reports, ad-hoc models, cash budgets, P/L and BS models, CAPEX & OPEX forecasts – you could easily get 65K low end and 85 on the high end. The difference is not the degree, it’s the experience.
Note, my assessment is geared more toward corporate finance analysis. However, my friends in all forms of financial services (Big four, IB, AM, Corp Fin) all basically started between 40k and 50k post undergrad. We all have seen guys with MS or MBAs come in with no experience in our respective firms and basically get paid the same thing we get (and they don’t know sh!t about how things work outside of text book land). The only advantage might be how quickly you gain responsibility (mostly due to age and previous work experience in a role with similar level of responsibility) and bonuses (if you get them) are steeper than in financial services, which on average could potentially add as much 20% of base to your over all comp at the entry level pre or post grad.
I’m sure it’s different if you went to Princeton or Wharton for your MS, but for us mere mortals I think my assessment is reasonable.
Edit: Grammer