Solution:
Value of Fedora and Ubunta post cash acquisition (given) = $135 million.
Value of Fedora and Ubunta post stock acquisition = $135 million + $90 million cash = $225 million.
Number of shares outstanding post stock acquisition = 5 + 3 = 8 million.
Value of shares received based on their likely post-acquisition price = [(225m) / 8m] × 3m = $84,375,000.
Gain to Debian’s shareholders is therefore $84,375,000 - $85,000,000 = -$625,000
The vignette states that “Fedora has offered to pay $90 million cash to buy Ubuntu” then later goes on to state “Alternatively, Fedora is prepared to buy Ubuntu by directly issuing stock” (paraphrasing there).
My question is, why does the solution use the post cash acquisition value of $135m as the starting point when considering the economic impact of the stock acquisition? The stock acquisition is an alternative to the cash acquisition but the solution seems to factor in both?
Thanks in advance
Value of Fedora and Ubunta post cash acquisition (given) = $135 million.
Value of Fedora and Ubunta post stock acquisition = $135 million + $90 million cash = $225 million.
Number of shares outstanding post stock acquisition = 5 + 3 = 8 million.
Value of shares received based on their likely post-acquisition price = [(225m) / 8m] × 3m = $84,375,000.
Gain to Debian’s shareholders is therefore $84,375,000 - $85,000,000 = -$625,000
The vignette states that “Fedora has offered to pay $90 million cash to buy Ubuntu” then later goes on to state “Alternatively, Fedora is prepared to buy Ubuntu by directly issuing stock” (paraphrasing there).
My question is, why does the solution use the post cash acquisition value of $135m as the starting point when considering the economic impact of the stock acquisition? The stock acquisition is an alternative to the cash acquisition but the solution seems to factor in both?
Thanks in advance