Strategy on Exam day

Interesting to see the different trains of thought here. Personally, I know that I’d go crazy if I didn’t do somewhat of a review before going back in for the second half of my exam. Maybe I’m manic.
 
JDP wrote:
My question, and I believe that of this thread’s author, is along the lines of, if there was 1 set of econ on AM, and none on FI and PM, is it safe to assume I wouldn’t see econ (since it can be 5%) and devote my an hour break time to brush up on FI and PM?
Click to expand...
Nobody is answering because its kind of silly to ask. If a topic must be greater than 0% of the test and it wasnt asked in the morning, it has to come up in the afternoon. There are no topics with 0% possible.
 
That wasn’t what I was going for. Of course every topic will appear on the test. What I was trying to ask is how “spread out” for a lack of a better word will the topics be?
If in the AM we have 2 FRA, 1 Deriv, 2 FI, 1 EQ, then I can pretty much tell you which topics we would be expecting in the second half, but if instead we were given: 1 FRA, 1 Deriv, 1 EQ, 1 FI, 1 Corp Fin, 1 Ethics then a lot of options are still available.
I really dont think it’s that silly of a question personally
 
Probably thinking too hard on this one. Its an hour lunch. You get to skim one topic over a sandwich. If youre capable of reading several books in an hour, you’ve probably covered everything well enough anyway.
 
if PM doesn’t show up in the morning, then it’s probably worth looking over some formulaes during lunch, then doing that vignette FIRST in the afternoon.
perhaps econ also, but tbh I find remembering the econ formula totally impossible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top