archived_user
New member
- Jun 18, 2026
- 0
- 0
The nominal tax drag simplifies to this:
Tax Rate x ((1 + return)^Time - 1)
so as return or time increase, the value of tax drag increases.
So far, so good.
The CFAI says this:
Because the tax drag in increases with the investment return and time horizon, the value of a capital gain tax deferral also increases with the investment return and time horizon.
(Level III Volume 2 Behavioral Finance, Individual Investors, and Institutional Investors , 4th Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions p. 180).
The conclusion does not make sense to me. Tax drag is essentially lost money from the investor’s perspective so it is sounds like a loss to me….
Intuitively, away from this gobbledygook, the investor is benefiting from tax-free growth of his/her wealth so s/he benefits if return/time horizon increase.
I just need some comments on CFAI’s language to help me understand their language…i just want to make sure that i am not losing something here…
thanks
Tax Rate x ((1 + return)^Time - 1)
so as return or time increase, the value of tax drag increases.
So far, so good.
The CFAI says this:
Because the tax drag in increases with the investment return and time horizon, the value of a capital gain tax deferral also increases with the investment return and time horizon.
(Level III Volume 2 Behavioral Finance, Individual Investors, and Institutional Investors , 4th Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions p. 180).
The conclusion does not make sense to me. Tax drag is essentially lost money from the investor’s perspective so it is sounds like a loss to me….
Intuitively, away from this gobbledygook, the investor is benefiting from tax-free growth of his/her wealth so s/he benefits if return/time horizon increase.
I just need some comments on CFAI’s language to help me understand their language…i just want to make sure that i am not losing something here…
thanks