A guy I know (no; not me) lists CAIA after his name on his resume etc, but hasn’t paid annual dues (currently $250) in a couple years, so he is technically no longer a CAIA member.
I know CAIA is not cool with this because their website says:
” YOU MUST BE A CAIA MEMBER IN GOOD STANDING IN ORDER TO EARN THE RIGHT TO USE THE CAIA DESIGNATION. You must also renew your membership annually or biennially to maintain your status in good standing, and to retain the right to use the designation. ”
He figures that the $2200 in exam fees that he paid was “plenty” considering the amount that it has benefitted his career so far. (ie none)
What do you think of this… Sensible? Unethical? Both?
On one hand, the exam+annual fees will pretty easily add up to $10,000 over a career, which seems like a lot to pay for a designation that even most folks in the industry have never heard of. And he is not “really” misleading anybody, since he passed the exams and was at one point awarded the designation.
On the other hand, it seems obviously wrong to lay claim to a designation that you’re clearly not supposed to be using.
I know CAIA is not cool with this because their website says:
” YOU MUST BE A CAIA MEMBER IN GOOD STANDING IN ORDER TO EARN THE RIGHT TO USE THE CAIA DESIGNATION. You must also renew your membership annually or biennially to maintain your status in good standing, and to retain the right to use the designation. ”
He figures that the $2200 in exam fees that he paid was “plenty” considering the amount that it has benefitted his career so far. (ie none)
What do you think of this… Sensible? Unethical? Both?
On one hand, the exam+annual fees will pretty easily add up to $10,000 over a career, which seems like a lot to pay for a designation that even most folks in the industry have never heard of. And he is not “really” misleading anybody, since he passed the exams and was at one point awarded the designation.
On the other hand, it seems obviously wrong to lay claim to a designation that you’re clearly not supposed to be using.