akanska, thanks for pointing that out.
with two bread-winners in many information worker families, telecommuting becomes a solution to a growing societal problem. it allows you to actually have some face-time with your kids while they’re young and need that face-time with a parent (or else they’ll turn into emotionless robots, a generalization but probably has some merit).
i was talking to my spouse about this, and the only negative against telecommuting for the individual would disappear should telecommuting become the norm for ALL employees in the knowledge/information sectors. the negative is that one won’t be considered for promotions b/c of below-average face-time with current managers, but if all employees work from home, this is not an issue, and it would likely result in better promotions, based on merit instead of @$$kissing.
so with no negatives to the individual except for a reduction in “work community”, the individual gains all the positives, with the major ones being more time with family and friends instead of coworkers, and the money/headache saved on commuting.
but like it was said in a previous thread, the employer sets where you work and the positives for the employer include:
> increased productivity; studies show that employees are more productive at home
> lower salary costs (which tend to be a major expense for knowledge/information employers
> lower overhead (no need for 90% of your office buildings/space)
plus, if we ever get any carbon tax in NA, expect to see carbon credits for employers who promote telecommuting, further incentivizing employers to not offer but require telecommuting.
the only REAL issue with telecommuting is security of information.. that is the only barrier that I see. and for those of you who love your commute so much that you’d rather continue commuting, ride a bus around your town for 20 mins then head back home and start work, haha!