Volatility v/s OAS

Sanjay Sachdev

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2026
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Suppose if anlayst assumes the lower than actual level of volatility, the callable bond will appear to have higher than actual level of OAS - can anyone explain this ?
Also, can you please explain what this formula says : OAS = Z-spread - option cost
 
Think of a binomial tree. The greater the assumed volatility, the wider the future price swings, so the more likely that the bond will be called; the smaller the assumed volatility, the narrower the future price swings, so the less likely that the bond will be called.
When the bond is called, the bondholder receives a lower cash flow than he would if the bond weren’t called. Therefore, the greater the assumed volatility, the lower the future cash flows; the smaller the assumed volatility, the higher the future cash flows (though never greater than for a noncallable bond).
The lower the cash flows, the lower the discount rate required to get a specified PV: today’s market price; the higher the cash flows, the higher the discount rate. The lower the discount rate, the lower the spread (OAS) added to the treasury rates; the higher the discount rate, the higher the spread (OAS) added to the treasury rates.
So:
  • Greater volatility, wider price swings, higher chance of being called. lower cash flows, lower discount rate, lower OAS.
  • Smaller volatility, narrower price swings, lower chance of being called. higher cash flows, higher discount rate, higher OAS.
(I encourage you to go through the same sequence for putable bonds.)
Switching gears …
Z-spread is the spread – additional yield above that of a risk-free bond – paid to cover all risks, including option risk. OAS is the spread – additional yield above that of a risk-free bond – paid to cover all risks except option risk. The difference, therefore, is the spread to cover exactly the option risk: it’s the price of the option, measured in basis points of yield.
 
S2000magician - Thanks for all your great help!!!!!
 
one small doubt - when you say higher/lower CF’s, you mean re-investment component -right ?
 
No. I mean that when the market value (of the option-free bond) is $1,160.36 and they call it at $1,100, you get less cash than you would if you could sell the option-free bond in the market.
 
Comment here:
Higher Vol–> higher probability of being called–> lower cash flows–> **Higher Discount**
Lets assumed you have a 3 year bond called in year 2 at par. Now lets assume the its market price is $110. If it gets called in year two its market price will be $105. So wouldn’t you use a higher discount to get it down to its market price?
 
We’re talking about the market price today; we have no idea what the market price will be in the future.
If it’s called in year 2 then you have a lower cash flow in year 2. You’re discounting that year 2 cash flow back to today to get today’s price. If the cash flow is lower, you need a lower discount rate to get to today’s price.
 
Back
Top