Just curious from III-ers who have passed both, what are the big differences between the first 2 exams? I’ve heard Level 2 is much harder and I am trying to understand exactly why? Is it that Level 2 is more integrative with the problem sets, and you need to have a stronger grasp on the material in order to do that (whereas Level 1 was more piecemeal in approach)? I notice that there is a lot of repetition, especially in FRA. How should studying for levels I and II differ?